A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
G
Gpg Management
3.6(219)
Agent•
151 Properties•3472 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 52
E
230 East 81st St., LLC
3.3(2)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•15 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
R
Randy Glick
3.3(41)
Head Officer•
35 Properties•617 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 12
R
Raymond Muscat
3.3(2)
Site Manager•
1 Property•15 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3 stars
Over 2 years ago
Nice Little UES Apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean, nice area, no rats or mice
Cons:
Impossible to reach landlord
3.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Mixed Review
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building has been purchased and renovated by the company that bought it. The renovation was excellent, but unfortunately it led to a period of no heat for over 4 weeks during a cold April a few years ago, but after it was over the electrical systems, plumbing and hallways were upgraded. The old landlady was disabled and she was not able to tend to the building’s needs for a long time. The building is much better now then before.
Cons:
The problem with a lot of Manhattan real estate companies is that they constantly cut corners and overwork their staff to maximize profits. This is true to some extent for this building. Many repairs are done on the cheap. A toilet is repaired with a quick fix when the interior of it needs it be replaced. A broken refrigerator is replaced with a low quality one that also breaks. Minor water damage goes repaired. Duct tape is wrapped around a pipe that needs replacement. Trash overflows the trash bins outside. (The hard working but overworked and underpaid super can’t keep up.) The heat shuts off at night for about 7 hours and the apartments can get cold. It’s irritating. Unfortunately the new owner’s attitude seems to be, “You’re lucky to be here, so just shut up.” ( A quick side note: At some point more and more tenants will start leaving the city in droves because they are fed up with high rent and low quality. This has happened during the epidemic. New York City real estate will have then committed suicide with its years of arrogant contempt for its tenants, but I know they will somehow blame everyone else but themselves for their own greed, neglect and incompetence.) This building is really in the middle range of quality. Not great but not horrible either.
Advice to owner:
Return emails from your tenants. The income you get from this building is very good. You have the money to fix things in a non- half assed way.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here