235 East 84 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10028

38 Units

Built in 1920

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.23 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
13
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jun 27, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department walls and ceiling. in the kitchen located at apt 16, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Hazardous
20
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jun 28, 2024: § 27-2026 adm code repair the leaky and/or defective water supply pipe riser on south in the bathroom located at apt 16, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
14
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 23, 2023: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 16, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
K
Kalmar Realty LLC
3.6(5)
Owner
Corporate Owner
2 Properties46 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
K
Kenneth Kahn
3.6(5)
Head Officer
2 Properties46 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
T
Tom Popovic
3.6(5)
Site Manager
1 Property38 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
R
Ramanju Properties, LLC
3.3(59)
Head Officer
126 Properties1410 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 29
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (5)

Over 2 years ago
personally i like it
Former Tenant
Pros:
really great location, pretty good price for what you’re getting all around, very responsive super.
Cons:
did run into a decent amount of cockroaches but that kind of comes with the territory. no security cameras in the mail room, packages often stolen
Advice to owner:
security cameras pls :(
Over 2 years ago
Former Tenant - Pros & Cons
Former Tenant
Pros:
Excellent on-site super. Wide staircases. Natural light. Packages were hardly ever stolen. Garbage area was outside so no smell in the building. Great location. Quiet.
Cons:
Saw cockroaches sometimes (though they treated for them constantly). Lived on a high floor (no elevator). Sometimes the shower water temperature could be finicky.
Advice to owner:
Keep Tom (the super) forever! He’s fantastic.
Over 3 years ago
Maintained and Nice
Former Tenant
Pros:
Super is very friendly and helpful. Cleans the building frequently. Stairwells are very wide.
Cons:
High floor walk-up.
Over 3 years ago
Old, unhealthy building...
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, clean despite things falling apart everywhere.
Cons:
Cheap repairs if they even happen. Bad plumbing, lead, mold and mildew inside walls, no security, too much heat, crazy leases.
Advice to owner:
Make repairs, get a better management company.
Over 3 years ago
The best word for this building is “fine.”
Former Tenant
Pros:
The on site super was genuinely great.
Cons:
Packages are left on the floor in the lobby, leading to high rates of package theft. When tenants ask about installing a security camera, the landlord’s response was “This is the risk you take when you live in a building without a doorman.”
Advice to owner:
Listen to feedback from tenants and maybe they won’t all move out.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here