210 East 95 Street,Manhattan, NY 10128
15 Units
•Built in 1900
•5 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
3.86 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
16
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jan 12, 2023: § 27-2005 adm code replace with new the broken or defective rubber gasket at refrigerator door in the kitchen located at apt 4a, 4th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Hazardous
21
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 06, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective concrete sidewalk at front areaway, 1st story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
20
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Feb 08, 2023: § 27-2043.1 hmc install the missing or repair/replace the defective window guard(s) in accordance with the specifications of the new york city health code section 24 rcny chapter 12. wg to install = 6; wg to replace = 0; wg to repair = 0; in the entire apartment located at apt 1c, 1st story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 22, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
C
Capada LLC
3.1(19)
Agent•
5 Properties•48 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
C
Carl Finger
3.1(19)
Head Officer•
6 Properties•57 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
I
Itoko LLC
3.2(7)
Owner•
1 Property•15 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
K
Kazuku LLC
3.4(11)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•25 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (7)
4.12 stars
1 month ago
Solid apartment with laundry
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to subway, reasonably priced
Cons:
Heating is messed up
Advice to owner:
Fix heating issue
2.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
UES Gem !!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Updated, great layouts.
Cons:
Super is sloppy. Trash is always everywhere. Mice (obviously).
3.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Better than a kick to the head
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building is very nice with beautiful finishes and overall is very nice
Cons:
The winter was brutally cold and after asking for the heat to be turned up, not much changed. We had issues with package theft as well. THE SECURITY CAMERAS DON’T WORK. When management was asked to do something about it, they ignored our calls.
Advice to owner:
Please fix the security cameras.
2.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Average NYC apartment with bad property management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Reasonable priced unit
Cons:
Illegal basement room. Unresponsive property management group (Carl Finger, Dorothy Finger, other Fingers). Security deposit issues. Took forever. Basement was freezing. With so many shitty apartments in NYC, hard to tell if this is above/below average situation.
Advice to owner:
Improve communication and heating in basement
2.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
Nice place, terrible management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Renovated walk up, nice roof
Cons:
Bugs in the winter, terrible during the flooding (water coming through light fixtures, management is not helpful and nearly unresponsive
Advice to owner:
Be there for your tenants
2.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
Nice building but with caveats
Former Tenant
Pros:
Modern finishes.
Built-in AC units.
Recent renovations.
Roof deck, although it is “illegal.”
Laundry in-unit.
Built-in AC units.
Recent renovations.
Roof deck, although it is “illegal.”
Laundry in-unit.
Cons:
Terrible management of garbage.
Superintendent is not reliable.
Superintendent will not reply to messages.
Automatic rent debit with no other payment option.
SEVERAL safety citations re: rodents, pests, and safety hazards for access to electrical on roof deck.
Inside halls cleaned very infrequently.
Superintendent will frequently complain when asked to do maintenance or just does not come when he states he will.
Heat in main living spaces is basically non-existent, especially on higher floors.
Windows are poorly insulated; gets VERY cold in winter.
Several ongoing citations on the building; management communicates nothing about repairs to tenants.
Superintendent is not reliable.
Superintendent will not reply to messages.
Automatic rent debit with no other payment option.
SEVERAL safety citations re: rodents, pests, and safety hazards for access to electrical on roof deck.
Inside halls cleaned very infrequently.
Superintendent will frequently complain when asked to do maintenance or just does not come when he states he will.
Heat in main living spaces is basically non-existent, especially on higher floors.
Windows are poorly insulated; gets VERY cold in winter.
Several ongoing citations on the building; management communicates nothing about repairs to tenants.
Advice to owner:
Take tenant concerns seriously.
Respond to tenants timely.
Offer online rent payment option.
Offer mail-in rent option.
Respond to tenants timely.
Offer online rent payment option.
Offer mail-in rent option.
3.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
Bad communication and management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The area is great
Cons:
The super isn’t really on top of things. We had a leaky fridge and told them for months, and when they finally got someone to come they didn’t tell us when they would arrive. I also couldn’t get a screen for my window. Bad communication. Also the apartment doesn’t get a lot of light.
Advice to owner:
Be more communicative and clear. Add a screen in the smaller room and fix the fridge. Put a different shower head that doesn’t spray water everywhere. If the lightbulbs die, provide the new ones because they’re hard to find and expensive.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here