302 East 83 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10028

20 Units

Built in 1920

5 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
20 complaints
Get rental reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 1 month ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.25 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jul 29, 2022: section 27-2005 adm code refit the door at bulkhead
Show all
flag
Hazardous
1
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jan 15, 2014: section 27-2040 adm code provide adequate lighting at or near the outside of the front entranceway of the building and keep same burning from sunset every day to sunrise on the day following 200 watts minimum required (light fixtures present)
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 09, 2021: hmc adm code: � 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 4a, 5th story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
Michael Santiago
2.5(3)
Site Manager
1 Property20 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
E
Eduardo Rodriguez
3.5(15)
Officer
4 Properties117 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
E
Eric Kalimian
3.4(20)
Shareholder
Head Officer
5 Properties157 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
E
Elk 1645 Second LLC
3.5(20)
Owner
Corporate Owner
Agent
6 Properties184 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

Over 1 year ago
Avoid unless okay with old buildings and noise
Former Tenant
Pros:
Restaurants and proximity to subway
Cons:
A lot of noise from traffic. Agent will likely book an appointment when it’s quiet to sell you the place. Dirty and old building. Garbage is literally outside the front door and it’s riddled with rats at night. Old appliances and general apartment. Landlord will not replace old items rather try to do a quick and dirty fix. Overpriced for how old and dirty the building is. Smelled like cigarettes in the hallway all the time and dark in the hallways too.
Advice to owner:
Please make more investments into the building and not do the bare minimum.
Over 2 years ago
Not worth it
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, Newer but poorly maintained updated kitchen and bathroom
Cons:
Poorly maintained, Poorly manager, Unprofessional Supers
Advice to owner:
Clean and update
Over 2 years ago
Nasty super and building manager
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location: across the street from the Q
Cons:
Cigarette smell, no laundry, super is always annoyed when asked to fix simple things also doesn’t live in the building
Advice to owner:
The building was ok but the super and building manager are miserable to deal with. Send an anonymous survey to all tenants for feedback then discuss resolutions with them.