NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
Upper East Side
/
Yorkville
/
340 East 86 Street
Yorkville

340 East 86 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10028

15 Units

•

Built in 1910

•

6 Floors

3.4(5)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    71 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 3 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    1.13 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    8
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 14, 2023: § 27-2005 hmc: refit door at gas meters room at basement
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    4
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 14, 2023: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective ceramic tiles at north wall in the bathroom located at apt 4, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    5
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 14, 2023: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges in the entrance located at apt 4, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    P
    Perry Washington Tenants Corp
    3.4(5)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•24 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    P
    Peter Williams
    3.4(5)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•24 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    W
    125 W. 76 Realty Corp.
    3.4(5)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•43 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    B
    Beaver Towers Inc
    3.4(5)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•34 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (5)

    5 months ago
    Great location and building, worst super and management
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Great location, cheap, relatively clean
    Cons:
    Awful super and management
    Over 1 year ago
    Friendly tenants, slow super
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Friendly neighbors, rarely noisy late at night.
    Cons:
    Slow to respond superintendent.
    Advice to owner:
    Respond quicker to tenant complaints please.
    Over 1 year ago
    Greatest location, worst management and super
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Location, location, location. This spot can’t be beat one side of the block has the M 15 uptown, the other side of the block has the M 15 downtown, and in the middle is the 86th St. Q stop, and the M 86 crosstown
    Cons:
    The major one is the inability to contact the management company. Repeated emails and phone calls go unresponded to. There’s no online portal to pay the rent. The other major one is the super/maint. They’re often not responsive, and when they are their level of repair is on par with a bad home DIY. Additionally my unit has had water damage from above 3 times in under two years, each time gets mucky water in my bathrooms on toothbrushes and in medicine cabinets. Super doesn't care, they just come after the face and do bad/mediocre paint/repair. Not worth the rent.
    Advice to owner:
    Get some sort of ticket system for repairs and issues, get a simple online portal for paying rent and for communicating end of lease issues
    Over 2 years ago
    Decent walkup, great location
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Location, clean, washer/dryer.
    Cons:
    Heat was cut off for a few days during the winter, super is not friendly at all
    Over 2 years ago
    not great management
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    super was good once he actually showed up. good location. no rats or mice
    Cons:
    management never answered anything ever. left us without heat for days. broken dishwasher for months before fixed.