316 East 92 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10128

35 Units

Built in 1915

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 316 East 92 Street
unit
Yorkville
316 East 92 Street #5RE
$3,690
2 beds1 bathEst. Jan 2025
Future
unit
Yorkville
316 East 92 Street #2RC
$3,624
2 beds1 bathEst. May 2025
Future
unit
Yorkville
316 East 92 Street #4FE
$3,514
2 beds1 bathEst. Mar 2025
Future
unit
Yorkville
316 East 92 Street #4RE
$3,514
2 beds1 bathEst. Apr 2025
Future
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
24 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
D
David Eberhart
3.5(60)
Head Officer
49 Properties825 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
D
Delphine Eberhart
3.5(52)
Officer
41 Properties695 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 7
J
Jassodra Balram
3.9(3)
Site Manager
1 Property35 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
D
Dorathea Eberhart, L.p.
3.5(40)
Corporate Owner
27 Properties461 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

3 months ago
Great but hot
Former Tenant
Pros:
Beautiful light. Super is great.
Cons:
No AC so literally sweltering. The occasional cockroach too.
Advice to owner:
None. Was great.
Over 1 year ago
Nice 1st apt.
Former Tenant
Pros:
The super is always out working, management is responsive and open during good hours. Live in super.
Cons:
Brick in apartment often smells due to mildew/humidity. Some water damage in the corner of the apartment, unsure how it happened. It's pretty cold in the apartment year round. Too small for the rent wanted at renewal, and they are NOT willing to negotiate at renewal.
Over 2 years ago
Apt As Expected
Former Tenant
Pros:
This is an older building with smaller apartments, but everything was satisfactory. No huge complaints. One thing I did like about the management company, is that they always seemed very reasonable with the rent on renewal. This doesn’t seem like the case in other management companies.
Cons:
The biggest things were that it is an older building, the apartments are smaller, and there are a few amenities that can’t be included in updates (i.e. dishwasher, laundry dryer in building). Going in there though with those expectations, this wasn’t as bothersome.
Advice to owner:
If possible, it would be nice to have updates to the apartments.