A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
P
Peter Malitek
3.3(3)
Site Manager•
1 Property•10 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
E
315-17 East 92nd Street 2009, LLC
3.5(5)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•20 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
R
Robert Drechsler
3.5(5)
Shareholder•
Agent•
Head Officer•
2 Properties•20 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
B
Beatrice Drechsler
3.3(3)
Officer•
1 Property•10 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (3)
2.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
A basement of I’ll repute
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to Carl Schurz park.
Cons:
Horribly managed, possibly illegal basement apartment that hasn’t been updated in 11 years.
Advice to owner:
Better pest control. Mice and bugs will forever be more at home than the tenants.
4.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Comfy but not a Rockstar
Former Tenant
Pros:
The residents seem to be older or families so you don’t have to worry about loud noise. Even the tenants in the surrounding buildings look to be very respectful of noise. We had one bug issue in the year I’ve lived here. It was handled immediately! In fact an exterminator is sent every month as a courtesy if you need him or not ! Overall it has been a comfy and cozy living building. My only companion is the walk up but overall that seems like a small complaint against all the perks!
Cons:
When something breaks in the apartment it does take the super sometime to come around and fix it. He always does fix what’s wrong but it takes him way to long to come around.
Advice to owner:
Just better communication between the super and tenants. He is very sweet and always fixes what wrong but could work on his timing. Ye
3.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Just ok, not great
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, relatively clean common area.
Cons:
Trash on the street, recycling in building, slow response to repairs
Advice to owner:
Be more thorough in your Maintenance of the building
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here