345 East 92 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10128

20 Units

Built in 1910

5 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
36 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
N
Nicholas Orlando
3.5(27)
Corporate Owner
186 Properties3833 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 16
J
Jam 345 E 92 LLC
3(6)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties74 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
S
Steven Pinchasick
3.5(12)
Site Manager
Head Officer
3 Properties62 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
E
Ebmg LLC
3.6(46)
Agent
182 Properties4757 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 21
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (6)

4 months ago
Cheaply renovated, terrible property manager
Former Tenant
Pros:
In unit washer/dryer and washing machine
Good natural light
Cons:
The property manager - Jeff Saliba - is awful and worth not moving in to the building for.
The apartments are tiny and advertised as a two bedroom so they can bump up the price but it's not accurate. Things break a lot and Jeff is never there to fix any of it. The only nice person is the EBMG representative
Advice to owner:
Fire Jeff Saliba and have a cleaning service for the stairs.
Over 2 years ago
Not that great
Former Tenant
Pros:
Mostly clean, good heating system, in unit laundry and virtual doorman
Cons:
Roach infested building and must demand extra help outside of monthly maintenance, rising rent cost is not justified, packages are downstairs and have been stolen, heard of ground floor tenants experiencing rodent problems
Advice to owner:
Listen to tenant complaints
Over 2 years ago
A decent apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Aesthetically pleasing apartment.
Cons:
Not very clean, management very unresponsive.
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive
Over 2 years ago
Overall pretty decent
Former Tenant
Pros:
-safe
-quiet
-management company relatively attentive (super was not though)
-1x/month free extermination services
Cons:
-super was often unresponsive/bothered by tenant requests
-heat/hot water issues at beginning of every heat season
Advice to owner:
-need super to be more attentive to tenant’s issues
Over 2 years ago
345 E 92 Review
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is great
Cons:
Noisy neighbors? At 3 AM on a weeknight? 3 nights a week? Ignored by management? Check. Random problems with hot water, no water, or last minute electrical work in your unit for multiple days? Check. Difficulty moving out? Check.
Over 2 years ago
Perfect for a 20 something to live in
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, very advanced technology
Cons:
Ants on first floor, management is barely responsive, and apartment wasn’t cleaned before moving in