A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.2 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 27, 2023: § 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system missing , 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 22, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
P
Park Terrace 103.llc
2.9(2)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•14 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
S
Stanley Commons Owner, LLC
2.3(3)
Corporate Owner•
7 Properties•250 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 13
E
424 East 83rd Operating.llc
2.7(12)
Corporate Owner•
108 Properties•1591 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 65
R
Rutland Corners.llc
2.9(2)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•14 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
2.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
Renters beware
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location. Decent sized apartment
Cons:
Constantly had issues with heat and hot water mid winter and the management company was completely unresponsive. The super never showed up when the management company said he would. My apartment shower flooded into the apartment below, the radiators essentially became sprinklers and would leave sitting water all over the floor. I called the management company in tears multiple times throughout the 11 months I lived there and they just didn’t care at all or make any sort of good faith effort to fix things that were essential to safely live in the apartment. But they sure as hell expected their rent on time! We moved out early and forfeited our security deposit because we couldn’t stand living there anymore after coming home one day to one bedroom completely flooded.
Note: I lived here 2013-2014 but the building is still owned by the same company so I am doubtful anything has changed.
Advice to owner:
Remember that the people you rent to are humans who need (and legally are entitled to) necessities like heat and hot water.
3.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
Wonderful space but needs gut renovation
Former Tenant
Pros:
-Super cute and charming -Large apartment space -True two bedrooms -Great layout -Quiet building -Very nice super
Cons:
-No heat for days -No hot water for days -Boiler needs to be replaced -Unresponsive management -Apartment problems take weeks to be resolved -Super can only come fix problems M-Th 7am-3pm -Loose stairs
Advice to owner:
The building really needs to be renovated, it has so much potential but it is slowly falling into disrepair.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here