A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.13 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
4
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 28, 2021: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). inoperable located at apt 2a, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 28, 2021: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches located at apt 2a, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
G
Gerald Leibman
2.6(6)
Shareholder•
Officer•
Head Officer•
9 Properties•360 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 18
S
Sovereign;realty;co
2.3(2)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•64 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
M
Miguel Polanco
2.6(6)
Corporate Owner•
9 Properties•360 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
S
Sovererign Realty CO
2.3(2)
Agent•
1 Property•37 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
2.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Rent stabilized, with a side of cockroaches
Former Tenant
Pros:
Super is very nice and responsive. Has an elevator that works the majority of the time. Rent stabilized, which is nice in today’s market. Laundry in basement. Trash is emptied very regularly.
Cons:
This building has a serious cockroach problem. They bring in the monthly exterminator but it’s obviously a much larger issue. I see at least one a month, sometimes they’re already dead, sometimes they’re not. Thankfully most of the time they are on the smaller side for NYC cockroaches. I guess that’s the silver lining. There was also a gas leak last year and we didn’t have gas in our kitchens for 8 months.
Advice to owner:
Fix the bug problem.
2.25 stars
Over 3 years ago
Roach motel Ltd
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is great. New super is good.
Cons:
This building is infested with roaches, last year they got a new super who is more proactive with extermination and clearing the garbage out of the building but it doesn’t make up for the years of neglect and roach infestation. The management company uses a sleaze ball realtor ( alexi) to help with renting the building and he charges double rent for you to get in. He also shows the building in the evening and signs paperwork not in the building, in hind site that was to avoid potential renters from seeing the roaches.
Roaches are everywhere - in the walls, in your kitchen cabinets, coming out of the garbage shoots on every floor. I lived there for
If they employ a broker to fill the building then he should not be charging a broker fee to the residents that proactively find the posting themselves. He does not represent the person renting, his interest should be payed by the building/management company.
Advice to owner:
Get a proper long term approach to extermination. Coming once a month does nothing. If you employ a realtor to fill the building then residents should not be charged a broker fee.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here