NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
Upper East Side
/
Yorkville
/
430 East 86 Street
Yorkville

430 East 86 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10028

131 Units

•

Built in 1931

•

17 Floors

3.5(3)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    125 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 4 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.03 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    0
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    3
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Jul 30, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective latch set at fire door to stairs at public hall, 6th story, section at east
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    1
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Mar 17, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective missing north fire doors at mail box area at public hall, 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    A
    Astoria 35 Inc
    3.9(40)
    Corporate Owner•
    26 Properties•1941 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 44
    D
    David Herman
    3.5(3)
    Agent•
    1 Property•131 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    F
    Four Thirty Realty LLC
    4(5)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•217 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    C
    Charles Alpert
    3.9(42)
    Shareholder•
    Head Officer•
    24 Properties•2035 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 47
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (3)

    Over 2 years ago
    Good value
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Large layouts. Very nice doormans.
    Cons:
    Horrible building management company. Very rude.
    Advice to owner:
    Treat your tenants with respect.
    Over 2 years ago
    Built in 1931 and looks it
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Location and space, porter service, handy man 7 days a week
    Cons:
    Lazy staff, does not properly screen visitors, neglected property for years, inadequate heat, upgrades long overdue, laundry room looks like a dungeon, aftermarket electrical supplier, not Con Ed, no advance notice on water line clean out, self service elevators keep breaking down, building neglected, lobby is filthy, rarely mopped. Terrazzo not cleaned in forty years.Staff has gotten away with murder. Not a place to stay. Overpriced. Lazy management. Left tenant 3 days without refrigeration. No one volunteered that spare units were in the basement. House painter, a sub contractor, is allowed to ride passenger elevator all day, not service cab reducing elevator service to tenants.Not a well oiled machine. Greedy Supt. Intercom not operative from Apts. Management stinks. Says no pet policy. More pets than children.vermin. Tenants use public corridors for book storage. Staff too lazy to deliver packages upon arrival or notify tenants of packages. Not a good place to reside. Building socks. Wanted a 12% increase for a two-year renewal.
    Advice to owner:
    Better update your act. The times have passed you buy.
    Over 2 years ago
    Building amazing, management ok
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The building is amazing and the people who work there (doorman, porters, super) are all top notch.
    Cons:
    The mgmt company left more to be desired. You didn’t get the feeling they cared for you at all/ Unless they can get money out of you. Slow to respond or accomplish anything.