430 East 86 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10028

131 Units

Built in 1931

17 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.03 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
1
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jul 29, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective latch set at fire door to stairs at public hall, 3rd story, section at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 18, 2024: § 27-2031 adm code provide hot water at all hot water fixtures in the entire apartment located at apt 2c, 2nd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Astoria 35 Inc
3.9(40)
Corporate Owner
26 Properties1941 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 44
D
David Herman
3.5(3)
Agent
1 Property131 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
F
Four Thirty Realty LLC
4(5)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties217 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
C
Charles Alpert
3.9(42)
Shareholder
Head Officer
24 Properties2035 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 47
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

Over 2 years ago
Good value
Former Tenant
Pros:
Large layouts. Very nice doormans.
Cons:
Horrible building management company. Very rude.
Advice to owner:
Treat your tenants with respect.
Over 3 years ago
Built in 1931 and looks it
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location and space, porter service, handy man 7 days a week
Cons:
Lazy staff, does not properly screen visitors, neglected property for years, inadequate heat, upgrades long overdue, laundry room looks like a dungeon, aftermarket electrical supplier, not Con Ed, no advance notice on water line clean out, self service elevators keep breaking down, building neglected, lobby is filthy, rarely mopped. Terrazzo not cleaned in forty years.Staff has gotten away with murder. Not a place to stay. Overpriced. Lazy management. Left tenant 3 days without refrigeration. No one volunteered that spare units were in the basement. House painter, a sub contractor, is allowed to ride passenger elevator all day, not service cab reducing elevator service to tenants.Not a well oiled machine. Greedy Supt. Intercom not operative from Apts. Management stinks. Says no pet policy. More pets than children.vermin. Tenants use public corridors for book storage. Staff too lazy to deliver packages upon arrival or notify tenants of packages. Not a good place to reside. Building socks. Wanted a 12% increase for a two-year renewal.
Advice to owner:
Better update your act. The times have passed you buy.
Over 3 years ago
Building amazing, management ok
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building is amazing and the people who work there (doorman, porters, super) are all top notch.
Cons:
The mgmt company left more to be desired. You didn’t get the feeling they cared for you at all/ Unless they can get money out of you. Slow to respond or accomplish anything.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here