A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.31 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jan 28, 2018: § 27-2005 adm code replace with new the missing escutscheon plate at heat riser at ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 17, 4th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
Show all
Hazardous
5
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 18, 2022: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). ...missing located at apt 22, 5th story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 09, 2022: § 27-2005 adm code fire escape defective. properly secure loose metal tread 13th up from bottom from 5th story balcony at building front fire escape
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
321 E 93 LLC C/o Vincent Ventura
3.4(29)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
15 Properties•222 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
E
East 82nd Street Realty LLC
3.4(19)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
5 Properties•116 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
A
Antonio Ventura
3.6(25)
Site Manager•
Agent•
Officer•
11 Properties•175 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
V
Vincent Ventura
3.3(26)
Head Officer•
12 Properties•193 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
The new appliances/finishes look nice and it is removed from street noise. No pests in the actual apartment.
Cons:
The landlord is not communicative. The water is frequently brown and occasionally shut off without any warning. The appliances look good but they won't be repaired if they break. The oven was terrible and there is a neighbor with neo-Nazi stickers all over his door. Some other neighbors are quiet and nice but there are some who yell. Packages constantly stolen. It's fine but it isn't worth the money you're paying, especially for the size and the lack of light. You'll have to be really annoying to get anything fixed, and to get your security deposit.
3.12 stars
10 months ago
Great area but the building is average at best
Former Tenant
Pros:
The newly renovated apartments are nice. Laundry in unit. The apt is on a quiet street.
Cons:
The hallways and stairwell of the building are usually dirty, history of stolen packages after things get delivered, landlord is unresponsive to requests.
Advice to owner:
More responsive to tenant requests
4.12 stars
Over 1 year ago
Great neighbourhood. Quiet building.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Quiet. Well maintained.
Cons:
Landlord did not return security deposit. Was unreachable and ignored multiple requests.
2.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
The landlord is unresponsive
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location is good.
Cons:
Landlord never responded to any messages over email, text, phone calls.
4.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Tiny for 3 Roommates
Former Tenant
Pros:
gut renovated super quiet
Cons:
no elevator owner wasn’t very responsive very small apartment to share with two other people
4.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Small but clean
Former Tenant
Pros:
Quiet, clean, very safe neighborhood
Cons:
Mailbox is not organized, space is small but may be different per unit/floor level
Advice to owner:
Responsiveness should be improved
2.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
It’s an old building but the area is great
Former Tenant
Pros:
When I was there the rent was pretty affordable, the street is quiet-ish. It’s close to FDR entrance so that’s not great but it didn’t bother me.
Cons:
The apartment is just built really cheap and old. The building manager took too long to give me my security deposit. He’s unresponsive.
Advice to owner:
If you can’t oversee, hire someone to do so.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here