A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.35 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
6
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 25, 2024: § 27-2053 adm code post sign on wall of entrance story bearing name, address including apartment number if any, and telephone number of superintendent, janitor or housekeeper.
Show all
Hazardous
16
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jun 19, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: refit building entrance door at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
5
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jun 19, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective building entrance door at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
K
Kc 504 East 88 Street LLC
3(3)
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•20 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
R
Rene Zemp
3(13)
Shareholder•
Officer•
Head Officer•
6 Properties•132 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
K
Kevin Schreiber
3.1(170)
Shareholder•
Officer•
Head Officer•
66 Properties•1027 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 17
W
Westminster Management
3.2(140)
Agent•
54 Properties•1205 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 19
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (3)
2.38 stars
Over 1 year ago
Don’t move here
Former Tenant
Pros:
- quiet, nice neighborhood, close to train lines
Cons:
- had to pay a broker’s fee despite a sign in the front saying it is a no-fee building - trash is always piled up in the front and rats are always running around in the front - old, walk-up building with lots of pests (no matter how much I cleaned, there were roaches) - the water doesn’t drain properly - heat is on high in the winter (it gets really hot in the apartment) - no laundry in the building (it’s not worth it, especially when all the laundry mats around are so expensive) - weird holes in the walls that took forever to be fixed - updated kitchens, BUT there is no counter space - weirdly shaped triangular bedrooms - uneven floors, small bathrooms - overpriced for what it is
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Quiet and cute neighborhood but building only ok
Former Tenant
Pros:
Super close to Carl Schurz, modern appliances and doesn’t feel as old as the building is. Small but lots of storage and in good condition apartment. Rent is decent for area.
Cons:
Stinky and definitely rats in the ceiling (no other bugs though) and always a TON of rats outside the front door since garbage is poorly handled. Thin walls like most apartments and super tiny.
4.25 stars
Over 3 years ago
Good building but slow management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Recently renovated, great location
Cons:
Management is slow to respond to maintenance requests
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here