Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 25, 2020: section 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
1
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 25, 2020: section 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
B
Bhusri, Amarjit
3.6(2)
Owner•
1 Property•3 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
R
Roopa Bhusri
3.6(2)
Site Manager•
1 Property•3 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
A
Amarjit Bhsuri
3.6(2)
Joint Owner•
1 Property•3 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
M
Minerva Management
4.1(5)
Agent•
6 Properties•43 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 2
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
4.25 stars
9 months ago
Very good option in neighborhood
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building is well maintained and super /support staff is very good and responsive.
Cons:
Owner/landlord can be a bit overbearing at times. Not a big issue though.
2.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
Gaslighting Landlords
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building, as well as the Super are fine. The heating is a mess in the winter but the Super is kind and responsive about adjusting it. Never had any pest problems but there was also no preventative work done by the building.
Cons:
The landlords are truly horrible, gaslighting us on repeated occasions, even letting painters into our apartment without notice when no one was home. Then told us it was a mistake. Then went back on that claim, told us that they don't need to give us notice aboout painters or anyone coming into our apartment. When we first moved in, we got really nasty messages from the landlord about how inappropriate it was to text the old tenants about buying air conditioners (she gave us their contact information), or message her outside of work hours. Then she consistently messaged us outside of work hours. Ridiculous, awful, mean.
Advice to owner:
Reporting them to 311 after all the terrible ways they treated us.