Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.47 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 17, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
Hazardous
4
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 10, 2024: § 27-2045 adm code repair or replace the smoke detector defective in the entire apartment located at apt 4a, 4th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
9
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 10, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges at compactor closet door at public hall, 4th story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
325 East 101 Street Condominium Corp.
3.4(3)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•52 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 5
S
Stcharles Housing Corp
3.4(22)
Corporate Owner•
61 Properties•1352 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 53
H
Hsc Management Corp
3.8(10)
Agent•
71 Properties•1906 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 28
J
Josh Koppel
3.4(3)
Site Manager•
1 Property•34 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 5
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (3)
2.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
Terrible management, okay apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator and private outdoor space
Cons:
Management was awful. Cockroaches all over. We once got a notice ConEd was going to shut off lobby utilities. That’s how poorly run this building was. New management didn’t pay the super and he had to quit. Took over a month and a half to get back the security deposit back to the point we had to threaten to notify the AG and take them to small claims court. The “property manager” would not sign emails with their name, likely on purpose so you couldn’t reach them or know who they were. Just a mess
Advice to owner:
Don’t be property managers.
4 stars
Over 1 year ago
Nice apartment with management issues
Former Tenant
Pros:
Large, clean apartments with in-unit washer dryers and dishwashers. Very well constructed - minimal noise from neighbors, lots of storage.
Cons:
Management company changed and fired the old super, new one is nice enough and responsive but the circumstances around the firing of the old super were sketchy and most likely illegal. The building has issues with garbage disposal and cleanliness of common areas now.
3.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Good building for the area
Former Tenant
Pros:
-Bedrooms do not share walls with adjacent apartments -luxury finishes like solid core doors
Cons:
-hot water frequently goes out -doormen can be innatentive, don't actually hold or open doors -outdated kitchens -hard to deal with management company (HSC)