NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
All Upper Manhattan
/
East Harlem
/
323 E 101 St
East Harlem

323 E 101 St,
Manhattan, NY 10029

34 Units

•

Built in 2009

•

8 Floors

3.4(3)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 5
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 4 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.47 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    3
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Apr 17, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    4
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 10, 2024: § 27-2045 adm code repair or replace the smoke detector defective in the entire apartment located at apt 4a, 4th story, 1st apartment from west at north
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    9
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Dec 09, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges at fire rated door at north wall at public hall, 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    E
    325 East 101 Street Condominium Corp.
    3.4(3)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•52 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 5
    S
    Stcharles Housing Corp
    3.4(22)
    Corporate Owner•
    61 Properties•1352 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 53
    H
    Hsc Management Corp
    3.8(10)
    Agent•
    71 Properties•1906 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 47
    J
    Josh Koppel
    3.4(3)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•34 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 5
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (3)

    Over 1 year ago
    Terrible management, okay apartment
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Elevator and private outdoor space
    Cons:
    Management was awful. Cockroaches all over. We once got a notice ConEd was going to shut off lobby utilities. That’s how poorly run this building was. New management didn’t pay the super and he had to quit. Took over a month and a half to get back the security deposit back to the point we had to threaten to notify the AG and take them to small claims court. The “property manager” would not sign emails with their name, likely on purpose so you couldn’t reach them or know who they were. Just a mess
    Advice to owner:
    Don’t be property managers.
    Over 1 year ago
    Nice apartment with management issues
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Large, clean apartments with in-unit washer dryers and dishwashers. Very well constructed - minimal noise from neighbors, lots of storage.
    Cons:
    Management company changed and fired the old super, new one is nice enough and responsive but the circumstances around the firing of the old super were sketchy and most likely illegal. The building has issues with garbage disposal and cleanliness of common areas now.
    Over 3 years ago
    Good building for the area
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    -Bedrooms do not share walls with adjacent apartments
    -luxury finishes like solid core doors
    Cons:
    -hot water frequently goes out
    -doormen can be innatentive, don't actually hold or open doors
    -outdated kitchens
    -hard to deal with management company (HSC)
    Advice to owner:
    Get a different management company

    Be more flexible on rent
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here