NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
All Upper West Side
/
Upper West Side
/
143 West 96 Street
Upper West Side

143 West 96 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10025

92 Units

•

Built in 1927

•

15 Floors

2.5(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    139 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 6 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.06 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    1
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Jul 24, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... less than 10 sq feet at ceiling in the 2nd room from east located at apt 1a, 1st story, 1st apartment from south at west
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    4
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Jul 24, 2024: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). missing located at apt 1a, 1st story, 1st apartment from south at west
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    1
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 09, 2023: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove device preventing door from being self-closing , hook and latch installed at the building entrance door
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    L
    Lenny Bujaj
    2.5(1)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•92 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    D
    David.eisenstein
    2.5(1)
    Agent•
    1 Property•92 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    K
    Kipling Arms LLC
    2.5(1)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•114 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 4
    S
    Stanley Rintel
    2.5(1)
    Head Officer•
    2 Properties•114 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 4
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    Over 2 years ago
    Precovid review
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Location was great.
    Doormen we’re nice and helpful.
    Pro pet and lots of pets in building
    Pet friendly neighbors
    Cons:
    Doormen could be very rude and disrespectful.
    Management was non responsive to complaints about noise when renovating apartments
    No mail boxes for tenants (delivered by doormen)
    Bike storage is terrible
    No permanent doormen at entrance bc of old fashioned elevator needing to be handled by doormen. Unique but annoying bc you had to wait for doormen.
    Advice to owner:
    Investing in modern elevators would made a world of difference for tenants and doormen.