143 West 96 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10025

92 Units

Built in 1927

15 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 month ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.14 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 22, 2024: § 27-2053 adm code post sign on wall of entrance story bearing name, address including apartment number if any, and telephone number of superintendent, janitor or housekeeper.
Show all
flag
Hazardous
8
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 20, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at south wall in the 3rd room from north at east located at apt 11a, 11th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 22, 2024: § 27-2043.1 hmc install the missing or repair/replace the defective window guard(s) in accordance with the specifications of the new york city health code section 24 rcny chapter 12. wg to install = 1, wg to replace = 0, wg to repair = 0 in the entire apartment located at apt 11a, 11th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
L
Lenny Bujaj
2.5(1)
Site Manager
1 Property92 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
D
David.eisenstein
2.5(1)
Agent
1 Property92 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
K
Kipling Arms LLC
2.5(1)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties114 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
S
Stanley Rintel
2.5(1)
Head Officer
2 Properties114 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (1)

Over 2 years ago
Precovid review
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location was great.
Doormen we’re nice and helpful.
Pro pet and lots of pets in building
Pet friendly neighbors
Cons:
Doormen could be very rude and disrespectful.
Management was non responsive to complaints about noise when renovating apartments
No mail boxes for tenants (delivered by doormen)
Bike storage is terrible
No permanent doormen at entrance bc of old fashioned elevator needing to be handled by doormen. Unique but annoying bc you had to wait for doormen.
Advice to owner:
Investing in modern elevators would made a world of difference for tenants and doormen.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here