NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
All Upper West Side
/
Upper West Side
/
226 West 97 Street
Upper West Side

226 West 97 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10025

34 Units

•

Built in 1920

•

8 Floors

4.4(3)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 4 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.41 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    2
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Sep 14, 2023: § 27-2005 hmc: post, in a form approved by the commissioner, and maintain a notice in a common area of the building regarding the procedures that should be followed when a gas leak is suspected at public hall, 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    7
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 18, 2022: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). missing in the entire apartment located at apt 7c, 8th story, 2nd apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    5
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Sep 14, 2023: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 2b, 2nd story, 1st apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    D
    Dk Hester LLC
    3.4(71)
    Corporate Owner•
    32 Properties•623 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 7
    D
    Dalan Management
    3.6(155)
    Agent•
    48 Properties•1568 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 24
    R
    Ramon Arroyo
    4.4(3)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•34 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    E
    Ed 97 Owner, LLC
    3.3(13)
    Corporate Owner•
    4 Properties•115 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (3)

    Over 1 year ago
    Great building, Chilly Winters
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    All doormen are amazing, management responds quickly to requests and it's clean and quiet.
    Cons:
    Heat in the winter is loud and inconsistent. They've been having recent issues though so it's hard to say whether it's an ongoing problem
    Over 2 years ago
    Manager is unresponsive
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Doorman is very friendly, building is clean
    Cons:
    Pests and very small apartments for a high price. I had a stranger breaking in to my apartment and never received an apology. Pests were not managed after a month of insisting and personal items were damaged by the rodents. Upon arrival the apartment was not clean, it even had a dead cockroach
    Over 3 years ago
    Comfortable one bedroom
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Easy access to subway, grocery, and park
    Cons:
    No laundry, gym wasn’t nice.
    Advice to owner:
    Improve amenities and obtain more internet options.
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here