NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
All Upper West Side
/
Upper West Side
/
250 West 99 Street
Upper West Side

250 West 99 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10025

43 Units

•

Built in 1925

•

9 Floors

3.5(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Available Listings In 250 West 99 Street
    unit
    Upper West Side
    250 West 99 Street #1A
    $6,973
    4 beds•3 baths•Est. Apr 2025
    Future
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 3 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.32 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    2
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 02, 2024: § 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor ...... at public hall, 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    5
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 05, 2022: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color the ceiling and the north, east, and west walls in the bathroom located at apt 7c, 7th story, 1st apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    7
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Mar 02, 2023: § 27-2056.6 adm code - correct the lead-based paint hazard - presumed lead paint that is peeling or on a deteriorated subsurface using work practices set forth in 28 rcny §11-06(b)(2) 1st riser from south at west wall, north wall in the bathroom located at apt 7c, 7th story, 1st apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    alertIcon
    Alert:
    One of owners and associates from this building was on the Worst Landlord Watchlist
    M
    20 Magaw Apts
    3.3(245)
    Corporate Owner•
    136 Properties•3939 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 193
    R
    Ryan Diver
    3.5(1)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•43 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    M
    Mark Scharfman
    3.3(247)
    Worst Landlord•
    Agent•
    Head Officer•
    Officer•
    135 Properties•3976 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 203
    D
    D-day Realty LP
    3.4(6)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•85 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    Over 1 year ago
    Building past its prime
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Common areas mostly kept clean
    Cons:
    No doorman, no security, packages often go missing, laundry facilities often broken, combative and unresponsive building management, lobby area looks like last updated in 1964.
    Advice to owner:
    Tenants look at more than just the address to judge value
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here