208 W 109 St,
Manhattan, NY 10025

25 Units

Built in 1920

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
53 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.88 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 04, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
13
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 04, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak ceiling and north wall in the bathroom located at apt 3a, 4th story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 03, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 3a, 4th story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
J
Joshua Gotlib
2.8(65)
Head Officer
21 Properties356 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 18
T
109th Affordable Housing LLC
2.8(65)
Corporate Owner
21 Properties354 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 19
N
Naftoli Leiner
3(7)
Site Manager
1 Property25 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
logo
Nieuw Amsterdam Property Management
2.9(207)
Agent
207 Properties3287 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 212
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (7)

Over 1 year ago
decent, but old
Former Tenant
Pros:
quiet street, close to the train and great local businesses
Cons:
no elevator, tight staircase
Over 1 year ago
Great renovations that hide the crust below
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building was cheap. Renovated backsplash, tile, stainless steel appliances.
Overall mostly student population or elderly folk.
Cons:
Rats infest streets from 108th - 113th, due to street conditions and outdoor trash. Building started leaking in the lobby and owner management was very poor - tried to hold our security deposit hostage.
Advice to owner:
Need to wake up and realize that property management means you run a business, and thus are accountable to the people paying you thousands of dollars a month in rent. Simple repairs, keeping building operational, etc and communication are a prerequisite.
Over 2 years ago
Overall pretty ok
Former Tenant
Pros:
The neighborhood is pretty safe and nice
Cons:
I live on 2nd floor so barely no view or sun
Over 2 years ago
Neglect
Former Tenant
Pros:
The ability to control the heat via thermostat was great.
Cons:
Inconsistent pest control measures, lack of due diligence with regards to repairs and maintenance. Noisy neighbors.
Advice to owner:
Preventative maintenance instead of reacting to disasters would improve living conditions.
Over 2 years ago
Good building for students
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good COVID concession (2000/mo for 3 bedroom)
In-unit washer/dryer
Toilet plumbing is good
Cons:
Unresponsive super (our washer/dryer has been broken for months)
Hot water doesnt always work
Common areas not maintained (ceiling in lobby is always molding/falling)
Over 2 years ago
Don’t live here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Fairly close to campus, that’s it.


Cons:
Rats covered the streets, stairs were always dirty. Super never responded to our message
Advice to owner:


Over 2 years ago
Review of 206 w 109 (from touring, not living there)
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice lobby, clean, renovated units, good sized rooms
Cons:
The block is a bit noisy
Advice to owner:
Overall a good location especially for student renters