247 W 109 St,
Manhattan, NY 10025

15 Units

Built in 1910

5 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
57 complaints
Get rental reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.13 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 17, 2023: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the north wall in the bathroom located at apt 4, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Hazardous
14
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 17, 2023: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak the west wall and ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 4, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
14
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 30, 2023: § 27-2029 adm code provide an adequate supply of heat for the apartment in the entire apartment located at apt 7, 3rd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
N
Naftoli Leiner
2.8(5)
Site Manager
1 Property15 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
J
Joshua Gotlib
2.7(62)
Head Officer
21 Properties356 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 16
T
109th Affordable Housing LLC
2.7(62)
Corporate Owner
21 Properties354 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 18
H
Hp Morningside Heights Portfolio Housing
2.8(40)
Owner
26 Properties354 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 17
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (5)

7 months ago
The most disgusting building I’ve ever live in
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good neighborhood. Literally nothing else.
Cons:
Right off the bat, we were told heat and hot water was included in our rent but come winter we started getting charged for heat. Management said (despite our lease) we were responsible for heat.

From the day we moved in we had pest problems. Rats scurrying in the walls, dozens of flies, spiders, and ROACHES. The entire apartment is infested with German roaches. We also had mold that was ignored by management.

It took several months for management to take any of our concerns seriously and when they finally replied to us they refused to take responsibility for the issues and would not help us. We moved in at the end of April and I ended up leaving the apartment in December to stay with my family because the apartment was uninhabitable.

The landlord offered to let us break the lease at that point but were unwilling to return our security deposit so we said no. Then a couple weeks later the Department of Buildings responded to a complaint we filed and after surveying the apartment the determined it was “perilous to life” and we were told to vacate the apartment. The landlord is letting us break the lease and is returning our deposit.

NO ONE SHOULD LIVE HERE.
Advice to owner:
Take the health and safety of your tenants seriously.
Over 1 year ago
Awful management company
Former Tenant
Pros:
Honestly, I can't think of any. Our dishwasher worked?
Cons:
-Unit had consistent cockroach and mouse problem, which management ignored
-After they refused to help, a mouse eventually got into the inner fan of our fridge and left its poop there, spreading the poop across the whole fridge. Management didn't replace our fridge for months, only replacing after we threatened legal action
-Management would raise their voices and hang up the phone when we mentioned issues
-They tried to claim they never received our security deposit, trying to scam us into paying it again (we luckily had proof it had gone through)
-Our in-unit washer/dryer never once worked and never once was replaced by management despite repeated inquires
-The bathroom had consistent black mold problems
-One time a 311 inspector came to observe the pest issues; after noting that it was indeed a problem, he said "this landlord is whack", he'd had to deal with them so many times

Don't live here
Over 1 year ago
Lovely decade spent
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great starter apartment post college. Wonderful to have an in unit washer and dryer.
Cons:
Small bedrooms, faces a brick wall
Over 2 years ago
Location near to Columbia university and amenities
Former Tenant
Pros:
Safe neighborhood with good amenities.
Cons:
Poorly maintain and old. Heating system poor and no hot water available for toilet basin and washer and dryer not working.
Over 2 years ago
Ok Apartment. Would not rent again.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Garbage maintenance was good. Quiet neighbors. Mostly students. Location was good.
Cons:
Mostly students who don’t clean up after themselves which led to bugs/roaches. Their apartments were filthy with dirty floors. Maintenance takes a while to come fix a problem.
Advice to owner:
Improve maintenance staff. Should do mandatory pest control for everyone.