A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.9 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
22
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jul 26, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling in the 3rd room from east located at apt 38a, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Hazardous
83
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 24, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective intercom and return buzzer in the entire apartment located at apt 38a, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
53
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 30, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 58, 5th story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
I
Ivan Olguin
2.6(10)
Site Manager•
1 Property•83 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
B
Btg LLC
2.6(10)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•91 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
M
Manor Management LLC
2.5(24)
Agent•
20 Properties•457 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 33
S
Steve Gross
2.6(20)
Officer•
12 Properties•307 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 14
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (10)
2.88 stars
9 months ago
You get what you pay for
Former Tenant
Pros:
Apts are good size
Cons:
Neighbors are sketchy, management sucks
2 stars
Over 1 year ago
If I could give pest management and responsiveness zero stars, I would.
Former Tenant
Pros:
It had a good location and the apartments themselves are decent. It has an elevator and laundry room.
Cons:
Building management completely ignores pest reports. There was a bed bug infestation that they weren’t managing at all, and our apartment got bed bugs multiple times. And they ignored the concern completely, forcing us to have to pay for treatment.
The negatives so far outweighed the positives. By the end, living there was a nightmare and just thinking about that place gives me hives.
Advice to owner:
Actually do the job you’re legally required to do.
3.12 stars
Over 1 year ago
Well maintained compared to buildings in area
Former Tenant
Pros:
Located across from St Nicholas Park. Plenty of nice green space. Good location for public transportation. Reasonable rent for Manhattan.
Cons:
Building is in good condition for what’s in the neighborhood. Score reflects a broader comparison. The location atop a hill is more of a draw back
Advice to owner:
Renovated lobby. Make use of package lockers.
2.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
don't move in here!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighbors are super friendly, quiet neighborhood, laundry on-site
Cons:
management/landlord is non-existent. super works business hours and shuts phone off after 5pm. nothing gets fixed despite numerous 311 calls. CONSTANT PACKAGE THEFT. heat & hot water is hit or miss. they tried to get tenants to move out so they could sell the building and/or renovate apts for higher rent. We had nothing that we as tenants are legally entitled to. and not even a lawsuit could change this!!
Advice to owner:
at least pretend like you care about the people that pay you???
2.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
How l feel about the building live in.
Former Tenant
Pros:
It's clean, quiet in a good location. It is rent stabilized. It has some nice old fixtures.
Cons:
No heat, low water pressure. No closet space!!
Advice to owner:
Treat your tenants with respect!
2 stars
Over 2 years ago
Caution
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building tends to be pretty quiet
Cons:
Year round: management responsiveness, package theft, roaches, pests, weak water pressure, allergies (I had allergies before moving in but they intensified a lot. Probably driven by fact that it’s a pre-war building) Winter: low to no heat (very unpredictable)
2.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Terrible conditions
Former Tenant
Pros:
The best part is the location, and neighbors. Incredibly grateful to the Residents Council who tries to keep management accountable and organizes events such as Christmas decorating in the lobby.
Cons:
The number of heat violations is staggering, the owner and super are extremely unresponsive, issues go unaddressed for months if not longer. Also, it's very strange that the laundry and trash of the building closes at 8pm and the elevator does not go to the basement floor after 8pm everyday.
Advice to owner:
Please take your tenants' concerns seriously, especially regarding heat. Thank you!
1.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Unresponsive and neglectful building management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Quiet street and neighborhood. Tree lined location near a park. Street parking is relatively easy to find.
Cons:
Terrible building management. Tenants without adequate heat. No effort by the management to resolve issues. Management does not respond to emails or 311 complaints. Required ongoing legal action. Unsafe. Package theft with no effort to resolve the issue.
Advice to owner:
Please do not ignore your residents.
3.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Lovely neighbors, terrible owners
Former Tenant
Pros:
The neighbors in this building are lovely - fully ready to support one another.
Cons:
The building is infested with cockroaches, the building management rarely responds to issues needing repair, and the heat works only occasionally.
Advice to owner:
Stop trying to drive your tenants out.
3.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Building Review
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is in an ideal spot.
Cons:
The building is filled with bugs and rodents. Management never answers and never fixes problems promptly. They only call when they need something, ie you’re moving out and need the apartment to be showed.
Advice to owner:
Property owner needs to answer tenants. The entire time I was there I could never get anyone on the phone.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here