230 West 147 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10039

100 Units

Built in 1910

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 4
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.75 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
11
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 24, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling in the kitchen located at apt 1p, 1st story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Hazardous
97
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 20, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective spring balance balance at lower window sash at north wall in the 1st room from north located at apt 3q, 3rd story, 3rd apartment from west at north , section ''west''
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
67
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 20, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges in the entrance located at apt 3q, 3rd story, 3rd apartment from west at north , section ''west''
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
R
Remik Holdings LLC
2.7(9)
Agent
Corporate Owner
1 Property100 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
M
Michael Daniel
2.4(27)
Site Manager
Head Officer
3 Properties153 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 14
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (9)

Over 1 year ago
Roaches, garbage filled alley, infestations
Former Tenant
Pros:
There was almost no pros to living in this building except the natural light on some of the top floors
Cons:
This was the first NYC apartment I lived in that had a rodent infestation. We are talking about mice building poop-filled nests in my shoes and regularly dying/rotting around the apartment. I also got flees from a neighbor while living here, because they let their flee-infested pitbulls roam the halls freely. When I reported my flee bites (which I thought were bedbug bites) to the management company, they scoffed at me, refused to treat my apartment, and then let me pay for my own fumigation. More than a month later they apologized and told me that my neighbor’s apartment was full of fleas, and that I was “not crazy.” When it rained heavily, the main staircase in this building would turn into a waterfall, with water cascading down the steps. Finally, the alley behind the building was filled with large trash piles from tenants just throwing full on garbage bags and leftovers out of their window and into the floor outside.
Advice to owner:
Demonstrate more respect for your tenants instead of treating them like an underclass you have no problem making money off of
Over 2 years ago
Responsive super, bustling neighborhood
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building is fairly well maintained. The on site super is helpful although you might need to remind him once or twice. They provide indoor pest control bimonthly I believe.
Cons:
Plumbing definitely needs work. Will the shower be scalding hot or freezing cold today? Good luck figuring it out, because the water WILL jump to both ends of the spectrum without warning.
Advice to owner:
Fix the plumbing and control the rat situation outside! And give Hector a raise!
Over 2 years ago
Terrible building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cheap rent but not worth the stress
Cons:
Roaches, mice, packages stolen every day and management does nothing about it.
Advice to owner:
Burn the building
Over 2 years ago
Neither here not there.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great neighbors and great sunlight.
Cons:
Lived about 1.5 years there without gas. Management did nothing to make it up to us
Advice to owner:
Do better please.
Over 2 years ago
I’m not even sure why i lived here as long as i did
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location. Pre war building. Some great neighbors.
Cons:
Super is sweet but over worked. Water leaks. Prest infestation
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive
Over 3 years ago
Happy to have moved out
Former Tenant
Pros:
Wide stair case.
Cons:
Bed bugs infestations, rodent infestations, noisy neighbors.
Advice to owner:
Take care of infestations properly, don’t blame tenants and provide misleading information when you know there are infestations in multiple units.
Over 3 years ago
It was ok until the roaches
Former Tenant
Pros:
In my unit all the rooms had windows (including bathroom), which means good ventilation and light. I barely heard my neighbors around me too. Thick walls or quiet neighbors, idk?
Cons:
Gas for cooking was cut off multiple times for months. Very slow to respond to non-emergency issues. They never adequately addressed my roach problem. That very much contributed to my decision to move out.
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive to tenant issues.
Over 3 years ago
2 gas leaks in 3 years. Gas work cheap and holes not sealed. Roaches and mice.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, location, location. Easy access to 3, A, B, C, D trains.
Cons:
Cleanliness. Lack of landlord caring. Neighbors can get loud at times.
Advice to owner:
Get the building in shape. 6 months without gas twice in 3 years.
Over 3 years ago
Better, not Best
Former Tenant
Pros:
1. Spacious Rooms, for the area
2. Quiet Neighbors
3. Well kept, clean street
4. Friendly Super
5. Management is super chill
Cons:
The small things wrong with the apartment will never go away or be fixed.
1. The shower temperature is impossible to establish. Wouldn’t be a huge issue, ACCEPT that the temperature options were by no exaggeration unbearable. Freezing or Boiler-hot. And it will sneak attack mid shower when you think for once you’ve finally cracked the code.
2. Odd smell in the floor board of hallway. I thought something died. But smell would return regularly. People would come over and remark about the smell without prompting.
3. Management is generally chill, but that becomes a problem when you need them.
4. Kitchen faucet head needed to be replaced. And management pretending to be on it, until i finally just fixed it myself a month later.
Advice to owner:
If you want your rent on time, please don’t leave your tenets waiting for much needed repairs.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here