80 St Nicholas Place,
Manhattan, NY 10032

48 Units

Built in 1921

5 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
151 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.14 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
9
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 02, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code replace with new the missing upper escutcheon plate at riser on south wall in the bathroom located at apt 2d, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Hazardous
15
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 27, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective latch set at vestibule door , 1st story
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
30
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 06, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective latch set at building entrance door
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Aug 12, 2023: § 27-2142 adm code apts have been vacated by this department and cannot be reoccupied until so ordered after proof of compliance for apts # 2b 1st apartment from west at 3rd story (vacate # 235942)
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
G
Gilman Management Corp
2.6(8)
Agent
17 Properties379 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 15
R
Robert Raphael
2.7(35)
Head Officer
46 Properties1220 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 71
S
80 St.nicholas Pl. Associates, LLC
2.3(3)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties56 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
S
80 St. Nicholas Place Associates, LLC
2.3(3)
Owner
1 Property48 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

9 months ago
Filthy Building & Horrible Building Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
only thing I like about this building
spacious apartment
Cons:
- filthy always - dirty
- dirty staircases
- broken lobby doors
- gloomy lights in the hallways
- always dirty
- paint chipped and dirty walls in the hallway
- the front of the building was always dirty
- management office - extremely rude to their tenants
- the super does not clean
Advice to owner:
change your workers at gilman management and new super that actually works on making sure the building is presentable and clean
Over 2 years ago
It’s gotten worse
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cheap rent for what it is
Cons:
Dirty, not well maintained, non-communicative management, nice and roaches, parts of building literally falling apart
Advice to owner:

Over 2 years ago
Perfect location, terrible management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Right next to subway, big apartments, quiet neighborhood
Cons:
Litter out fronts, front door is often broken, leaky ceilings and mice, super is unresponsive at times, trash left in lobby
Advice to owner:
Maintenance/upkeep needs A LOT of work