78 St Nicholas Pl,
Manhattan, NY 10032

31 Units

Built in 1916

5 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
7.74 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
14
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 16, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling and all walls in the entire apartment located at apt 35, 3rd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Hazardous
112
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 16, 2024: § 27-2037, 2038 hmc: provide a safe and adequate supply of electric service to the fixtures outlet at east wall in the 6th room from north located at apt 42, 4th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
113
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 17, 2024: § 27-2031 adm code provide hot water at all hot water fixtures in the entire apartment located at apt 6, 1st story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Jan 31, 2020: §27-2153 adm code the premises has been selected to participate in the alternative enforcement program which may result in building-wide inspections, fees, and extensive repair work to correct violations and underlying conditions. charges for repair work done pursuant to this order, if not paid, will become liens on the property
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Arsale Realty Company LLC
3.9(276)
Owner
Corporate Owner
76 Properties9706 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 98
S
76 St. Nicholas Place LLC
3(5)
Owner
Corporate Owner
2 Properties82 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
R
Rose Property Mgmt Grp LLC
3.6(204)
Agent
46 Properties7034 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 73
B
Brian Ritter
3(30)
Head Officer
11 Properties627 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 19
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

Over 1 year ago
Not recommended for anyone
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location and accessible to trains
Cons:
Building is going through issues. Management never responds and pests grow. Music in the summer.
Advice to owner:
Help your tenants
Over 1 year ago
Avoid this building !
Former Tenant
Pros:
Apartments are decently sized and location is nice on a small quiet street.
Cons:
Management completely unresponsive, my pipes froze multiple times, had no hot water in the bathroom, broken dishwasher for nearly the entire 4 years I lived there. Packages would constantly get stolen and landlord refused to do anything about it (the tenant that was stealing packages was a friend of the landlord).
Over 2 years ago
Don't Live Here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great neighbors, close to subway
Cons:
Slumlord company that illegally deregulated most, if not all, of the apartments. Management company is only more responsive now because HPD has a lawsuit against them and has placed the building in the Alternative Enforcement Program (which was created to hold negligent landlords accountable). There are endless pest problems (rats, mice, roaches, ants) throughout building. The super is shady and looks the other way when one of the few bad tenants steals someone's package.
Advice to owner:
Knock the building down and start over
Over 3 years ago
Worst Management Company, Ever
Former Tenant
Pros:
Quiet building (at least the upper floors), and great location.
Cons:
1. Management will never respond. Leases will expire, problems will occur, Covid happened..and they just ghosted. Legit terrible service and not kind humans (ROSE MANAGEMENT COMPANY)
2. Management does not care about tenants and only cares about owners.
3. SOOOOO many violations.
4. Water and heat outages often.
5. Stopped providing exterminators.
6. Package thieves LIVING IN BUILDING. Supers and managers know and don’t do anything. “Cameras don’t work”...
7. No building upkeep — pipes burst, garbage has rats, building is filthy.
8. Rent deregulation. Beware.
Advice to owner:
Get a management company that provides a service to both yourself, AND your tenants.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here