565 West 139 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10031

36 Units

Built in 1910

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 565 West 139 Street
unit
Hamilton Heights
565 West 139 Street #5
$2,252
1 bed1 bathEst. Mar 2025
Future
unit
Hamilton Heights
565 West 139 Street #46
$2,671
1 bed1 bathEst. Apr 2025
Future
unit
Hamilton Heights
565 West 139 Street #61
$3,368
2 beds1 bathEst. May 2025
Future
unit
Hamilton Heights
565 West 139 Street #60
$2,477
1 bed1 bathEst. Jun 2025
Future
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.86 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
19
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 18, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at north wall in the kitchen located at apt 1, 1st story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
flag
Hazardous
46
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 18, 2024: § 27-2056.7, 27-2056.17 and 27-2056.8 adm code - certify compliance with lead-based paint hazard control requirements during period of unit vacancy by submitting required supporting documentation and affidavits for apartment located at apt 32, 3rd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
38
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 18, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective latch set at fire door leading to east yard at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Adam Mermelstein
2.3(5)
Head Officer
2 Properties134 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 12
S
Sedgcliff
2.1(7)
Head Officer
5 Properties532 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 25
A
Aspen Companies
3.1(3)
Agent
1 Property36 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
W
565 West 139 Street Holdings LLC
2.3(5)
Owner
Corporate Owner
2 Properties134 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 11
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

Over 2 years ago
Pretty good building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator, clean, good area
Cons:
Can be noisy outside sometimes
Advice to owner:
Repaint/renovate some apartments
Over 2 years ago
Been here 5 years. There is Good and Bad.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator. Friendly neighbors. Clean.
Cons:
Management is VERY difficult to connect with and unresponsive. When repairs are needed it takes a very long time, such as new mailboxes, elevator, or boiler.
Advice to owner:
Have more integrity and communication with your tenants.
Over 3 years ago
Horrible, unclean, bad management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to 1 train
Cons:
Horrible roach infestations, constant leaks in bathroom (ceiling caved in multiple times). Either silence or pitiful response from building management, could take weeks to even get ahold of them. They typically only responded once a 311 complaint was filed and then sometimes not even the . The super was completely incompetent. Do not move here
Advice to owner:
Actually address the problems in the building. Have a better system to let tenants get ahold of you.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here