NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
All Upper Manhattan
/
Hamilton Heights
/
552 West 146 Street
Hamilton Heights

552 West 146 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10031

21 Units

•

Built in 1920

•

5 Floors

2.8(5)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: Yes
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    3.47 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    18
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Sep 30, 2024: § 53, 187, 231 m/d law and department rules and regulations. provide a shoe properly secured to bottom of string of dropladder missing at fire escape
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    37
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Aug 30, 2024: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). defective in the entire apartment located at apt 8, 2nd story, 1st apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    17
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Sep 17, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges at 2nd public hall bulkhead from north
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    1
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 22, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    R
    113-117 Realty LLC
    3.1(16)
    Corporate Owner•
    12 Properties•260 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 12
    I
    Isabel Negron
    3.1(16)
    Site Manager•
    Agent•
    Head Officer•
    12 Properties•260 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 10
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (5)

    Over 1 year ago
    Don’t let the exposed brick fool you
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Super is nice
    Cons:
    Extremely Noisy disrespectful neighbors and management doesn’t fix anything. Rats in the laundry room
    Advice to owner:
    Do your job
    Over 2 years ago
    good super, clean floors
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Brick walls, clean
    Cons:
    no elevator, stolen mail
    Advice to owner:
    get better cameras and do something about it
    Over 2 years ago
    Okay on a budget
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    New features like exposed brick in some units, the neighborhood is great, and the Souper is the best.
    Cons:
    The owners don’t respond. They are rude and there are bugs.
    Over 3 years ago
    Bugs and mice.
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Porter was extremely responsive. Friendly neighbors.
    Cons:
    Multiple apartments had mice. Roaches in the hall & coming out of the recesses of the cabinets. Rats near the laundry room. And multiple units got bed bugs. Our neighbors claimed to have had them for five years. We got them too - and had to move out to escape.
    Advice to owner:
    Take the bugs & rodents seriously. Listen to tenants. Become responsive as a management company.
    Over 3 years ago
    Don’t move here
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Great supers who do their best even though management company is non responsive. lobby is clean and looks like it could be a beautiful place to live but don’t let it fool you.
    Cons:
    Management company never responded to anything including repairs, heat and noise complaints to the point we left. Rachet loud tenants, throwing their garbage out the windows. Management is charging market rate rents in what should be rent stabilized apartments.
    Advice to owner:
    Your lost good tenants in 552 and 550 because you don’t do your job
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here