A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.97 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
14
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 01, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
Hazardous
17
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jul 01, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color ceiling in the 2nd room from east located at apt 2e, 2nd story, 3rd apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
May 12, 2021: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 2e, 2nd story, 3rd apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
R
690 Riverside Drive Condominium
4.4(2)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•89 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
A
Abidin Radoncic
3.6(8)
Site Manager•
Agent•
Head Officer•
7 Properties•695 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 54
T
The 660 Riverside Condominium
4.1(13)
Corporate Owner•
9 Properties•493 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 12
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
Very racist super
Former Tenant
Pros:
It is a great building. But the super has clearly targeted the one person of color in our unit. I’m about to file a police report.
Cons:
The super has targeted at least two people of color in the building, probably more. Bringing issues to them that he has ignored with other occupants in the same unit.
Advice to owner:
Get a new super
5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great building, wonderful super
Former Tenant
Pros:
Rifat's the man; well-kept building
Cons:
Unresponsive landlords for condo unit
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here