614 West 152 Street,Manhattan, NY 10031
55 Units
•Built in 1920
•6 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.61 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 26, 2021: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color the ceiling and all walls in the 2nd room from north at east located at apt 6, 1st story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Hazardous
18
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 08, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective spring balance at lower sash at window at west wall in the bathroom located at apt 51, 5th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
12
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 08, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 51, 5th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
Alert:
One of owners and associates from this building was on the Worst Landlord Watchlist
M
20 Magaw Apts
3.3(245)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
136 Properties•3939 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 193
D
Dio Delrosario
3(5)
Site Manager•
1 Property•55 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
W
West 152nd Associates LP
3.1(10)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•97 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
M
Mark Scharfman
3.3(247)
Worst Landlord•
Head Officer•
135 Properties•3976 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 203
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
2.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
Deal of a Lifetime
Former Tenant
Pros:
was nearly renovated and had an open floor plan with a queen size bedroom and plenty of closet space. trending neighborhood with plenty of entertainment nearby
Cons:
bugs, but what else is new in NYC. beware of package thief on first floor, track your packages and be home lol
2.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
Enjoy receiving packages? Don’t live here!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Large apartment in a good area for a decent price.
Cons:
Packages are CONSTANTLY being stolen where the super couldn’t care less. There are cameras in the hallway for nothing more than decoration. Anytime we have any sort of problem in our apartment we have to threaten to not resign our lease to get them to do anything about it.
Advice to owner:
Answer our calles and get the cameras fixed.
3.83 stars
Over 3 years ago
Solid option
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator, in building laundry, fairly clean, fairly quiet, near Riverbank State Park
Cons:
Consistently raising the rent in a rent stabilized building.
Inconsistent with repairs
Inconsistent with repairs
Advice to owner:
More honest practices with rent
3.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
The Williamsburg of Harlem
Former Tenant
Pros:
New restaurants and bars and great neighbors
Cons:
No roof access
Advice to owner:
2.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
BED BUGS APT# 57
Former Tenant
Pros:
2 Elevators, two apartment exist doors for Apt 57. Good security.
Cons:
During the process of filling out the application. A document was provided indicating that bed bugs were found on the 5th Floor within this year 2020. It turned out after numerous inquiries that the only apartment affected was Apt 57, the apartment we were looking to lease. This being a health hazzard, I wanted proof that the Bed Bug problem had been resolved prior to proceeding. Based on the document provided, I got the impression that I was being fooled with a terminating company that was assisting management, for whatever reason to cover them. Bottom line, when I went further into verifying the two invoices, I got resistance from the gentleman who answered at the exterminating office which by the way, REFUSED out of curtisy and professionalisium to give me his name. He hung up three (3) times on me 🤔 Shortly after that management at the building rejected our application after it had been approved. That got me even more suspicious 🤨. Be vigilent & causcious.
Advice to owner:
A prospective leasee has the right to request Official Supporting Documentation after revealing I.A.W the lawthat there's been an investation of bed bugs. Making a general statement by saying 5th floor and finding out it was in the apartment we were about to lease was both unetical and unprofessional.
In the future provide a valid Official Supporting Document instead of some created in valid receipt with a PO#, Invoice and signature by the person that pesticided the apartment. This is a required state law requirement that you intentionally had someone falsify. This building Manager has an extrodinery amount of violations 🤔 Now that should be huge alert in reference to management quality by taking corrective measure to eliminate them.
Renter Be wear!!
In the future provide a valid Official Supporting Document instead of some created in valid receipt with a PO#, Invoice and signature by the person that pesticided the apartment. This is a required state law requirement that you intentionally had someone falsify. This building Manager has an extrodinery amount of violations 🤔 Now that should be huge alert in reference to management quality by taking corrective measure to eliminate them.
Renter Be wear!!
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here