940 St Nicholas Avenue,
Manhattan, NY 10032

73 Units

Built in 1922

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 4
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 940 St Nicholas Avenue
unit
Washington Heights
940 St Nicholas Avenue #6C
$3,031
2 beds1 bathEst. May 2025
Future
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
181 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.91 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
10
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 30, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department all peeling paint surfaces in the foyer , the 2nd room from north located at bsmt-apt b1, 1st bsmt-apt from west at north
Show all
flag
Hazardous
50
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 30, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective ceramic tiles at stairs in the private hallway located at bsmt-apt b1, 1st bsmt-apt from west at north
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
7
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 30, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at bsmt-apt b1, 1st bsmt-apt from west at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
S
Syed Ali
3.6(8)
Site Manager
1 Property73 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
R
R.e.m. Residential
3.6(8)
Agent
1 Property73 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
S
940 St. Nicholas LLC
3.6(8)
Owner
Corporate Owner
2 Properties81 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
R
Ramanju Properties, LLC
3.3(59)
Head Officer
126 Properties1410 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 27
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (8)

2 months ago
HUGE Apartment BUT...
Former Tenant
Pros:
- HUGE Apartment
- Great neighbors
- Not much noise
- Great neighborhood
Cons:
- Bathroom ceiling collapsed. BLACK MOLD due to lack of attentiveness and willingness to properly fix leaking water. We had to file a report with the city to get anything fixed which didn't start being fixed until the lease was almost up.
- LOUD Vibrating plumbing that sounds like jack hammers.
- Unresponsive management
Advice to owner:
Take your tenants seriously when they say there are issues, actually fix them properly and in doing so ensure the health and safety of your tenants.
Over 1 year ago
Do not recommend
Former Tenant
Pros:
Rent Stabilized building
Cons:
Poor property management
Over 2 years ago
The building is clean everybody respectfull super is not to up to part but okey
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean
No noise
Meeting
Landry room
Cons:
The super and the helper always gave attitude
Over 2 years ago
Nice building to live in
Former Tenant
Pros:
biweekly pest maintenance
live in super who is very responsive
elevator building
quiet and considerate neighbors
Cons:
basement laundry is constantly out of order
Over 2 years ago
Awful Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to trains. Large apartments
Cons:
Landlord does not solve most issues. Management is highly unprofessional and very often responds to emails with a sassy tone. Laundry room constantly in disrepair. Packages get stolen daily and yet management has shown no interest in working with tenants to solve the issue.
Advice to owner:
Fix the package stealing.
Over 2 years ago
Building is GREAT, Management/Ownership is Mediocre.
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartments are large. The neighborhood is usually fairly quiet. Close to the trains.
Cons:
The management company is often unresponsive. And it takes a lot of coaxing to get them to bring things up with ownership. Management company seems care way more about money and maintaining their relationship with ownership, than actually caring for the tenants. They are teetering on negligent. Either that, or ownership is negligent.
Advice to owner:
Connect with your tenants. It’s obvious that you get reported to the city and have had issues with us in the past... show us you care about our well-being. Because we sure are paying enough for you to care. Taking minimal care of the building and ignoring tenants issues (the constantly broken laundry room, for instance) exemplifies someone who is just taking advantage. And just FYI, we see through that.
Over 2 years ago
Natural light, well renovated
Former Tenant
Pros:
Convenient location, well renovated unit, lots of natural light, polite super
Cons:
Super is not always the most responsive but better than most, had some pest issues, a few packages were stolen
Over 2 years ago
Nice building, poor management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building has a beautiful entryway and the apartments are nice sized.
Cons:
I had multiple problems upon moving in that I was ensured would be fixed before my move in date. These problems included: splintered floors, no light covers, a broken bathroom sink, missing kitchen tiles, and other issues. Furthermore, I moved in during the height of the Pandemic and my apartment was not cleaned at all prior to me moving in. The most pressing issue has been that since April, I have had 8 or 9 different mice in my apartment. The first exterminator did nothing to help and it wasn't until I persistently followed up with maintenance and the building manager that the problem began to get resolved. I am leaving the apartment early because of the persistent mice issue that has never been fully resolved.
Advice to owner:
Please hold your supers more accountable for the work they do. The basement is gross and no one wants to go down there to throw out their trash or do their laundry. And your resident exterminator does not actually come to spray nor does he help with any issues inside the apartment. Also, it is important to communicate that the best way to get your problems resolved in the apartment is through maintenance on the app portal. Otherwise, texting the super does nothing.