NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
All Upper Manhattan
/
Washington Heights
/
1963 Amsterdam Avenue
Washington Heights

1963 Amsterdam Avenue,
Manhattan, NY 10032

3 Units

•

Built in 1900

•

4 Floors

3.1(3)
Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    4 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 3 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.66 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    1
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Mar 22, 2016: § 26-1103 admin. code: post and maintain a proper notice on wall of the entrance story in english and spanish on the availability of the agencys housing information guide. a sample notice can be found at www.nyc.gov/hpd. at public hall, 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    0
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    1
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    May 11, 2023: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective at vestibule door
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    G
    Gili Haberberg
    3.1(3)
    Officer•
    7 Properties•106 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    T
    Tower157, LLC
    2.6(8)
    Owner•
    Corporate Owner•
    15 Properties•269 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 7
    R
    Robert Seiden
    2.5(9)
    Head Officer•
    16 Properties•316 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 15
    A
    Arkar, Inc
    2.4(5)
    Agent•
    8 Properties•162 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 6
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (3)

    11 months ago
    Not the best tbh
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    You have a floor to yourself, and you theoretically have a balcony
    Cons:
    -non responsive management
    -roaches
    -building door gets stuck during the summer so you can’t leave
    Over 2 years ago
    Overall a good experience, but…
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Updated Appliances
    Generally Nice Neighborhood
    Quiet and respectful neighbors
    Whole floor to yourself
    Good light and space
    Cons:
    Never ending roach problem
    The super will rarely adequately fix things in a timely manner if at all, or insist that there isn’t a problem in the first place.
    Dishwasher has never worked despite having it “fixed” every few months.
    Very poor heat in the wintertime, but when we complain of no heat there isn’t really a response.
    Two of the rooms in our unit have windows facing a wall directly so no sunlight
    Advice to owner:
    More responsive with repairs, particularly adequate heat.
    Over 2 years ago
    Love the building! For the most part
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Beautifully updated building, quiet tenants, good interactions with landlord.
    Cons:
    It can be a bit difficult to reach the super for repairs and oftentimes we are told there isn’t a problem when there is
    Advice to owner:
    Providing clearer ways to communicate with management.