NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
All Upper Manhattan
/
Washington Heights
/
525 West 158 Street
Washington Heights

525 West 158 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10032

37 Units

•

Built in 1924

•

5 Floors

2.5(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 5
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Available Listings In 525 West 158 Street
    unit
    Washington Heights
    525 West 158 Street #5F
    $2,695
    2 beds•1 bath•Est. Mar 2025
    Future
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 4 weeks ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    3 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    26
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Aug 29, 2024: § 53, 187, 231 m/d law and department rules and regulations. provide a shoe properly secured to bottom of string of dropladder welded shoe of drop ladder at fire escape at building front at fire escape
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    58
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Jul 24, 2024: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code and dept. rules and regulations. remove the encumbrance obstructing egress from fire escapes consisting of household items at 4th story balcony at 1st building front fire escape from west at north
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    26
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Aug 23, 2023: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 5c, 5th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    1
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 22, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    H
    Henry Ting
    2.7(4)
    Agent•
    Head Officer•
    7 Properties•95 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 11
    M
    Mariwood, LLC
    2.7(4)
    Corporate Owner•
    7 Properties•95 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 11
    E
    Edward Ting
    2.7(4)
    Officer•
    7 Properties•95 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 11
    R
    Rainbowridge LLC
    2.5(1)
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•53 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 5
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    Over 2 years ago
    You get what you pay for
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    I liked that the apartments were spacious, however, some of the older ones that haven’t been renovated are in dire condition.
    The newer renovated ones have great light and space. Located close to train lines, which is nice.n
    Cons:
    Cockroaches are everywhere, had a mouse problem, packages getting stolen ALL THE TIME. Definitely someone selling crack out of their apartment, because they let in a lot of sketchy people.
    Advice to owner:
    Invest in renovating the lobby/entryway. Invest in better security for your tenants.
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here