567 Ft Washington Avenue,Manhattan, NY 10033
62 Units
•Built in 1920
•6 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
70 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.19 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jun 01, 2018: § 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor incorrect frame. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
7
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jun 01, 2018: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color all walls and ceiling. in the bathroom located at apt 2a, 2nd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jun 01, 2018: § 27-2070 adm code provide an adequate supply of gas to the fixtures at range in the kitchen located at apt 2a, 2nd story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
H
Heskels Asset Management
4.1(9)
Agent•
3 Properties•142 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
E
Elvis Debernardo
3.9(7)
Site Manager•
1 Property•62 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
H
Heskel's Riverdale
4.1(9)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
4 Properties•203 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
H
Heskels F.w Realty L
4.1(9)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•142 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (7)
3.62 stars
1 month ago
Lovely building, awful management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very charming building, location and neighborhood is great. Never had any pest problems.
Cons:
Landlord and super were very unresponsive, even when I was reporting major problems. It seems like they have a "bandaid fix" approach to maintaining the building. Leaks were a constant problem in multiple apartments, they were not fixed right away, and based on my experience with the landlord and super, I doubt they were ever properly fixed at all, probably just redid the drywall to hide the water damage so they could get in a new tenant.
Advice to owner:
Have more respect for your tenants and your properties.
3.75 stars
5 months ago
My daughter lived here and really liked her apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Lots of light. Hardwood floors.
Cons:
Not clean enough. No dishwasher
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive
3.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Well-maintained building in quiet neoghborhood
Former Tenant
Pros:
Large floor plans, unique architectural details - community of residents who have been in the building for many years
Cons:
Walls / ceiling / floor are thin so you can often hear neighbors (and dogs barking) - floors are very creaky - super is unresponsive (but porter is great)
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive to tenant inquiries and/or hire a better super who can field tenant inquiries on your behalf
2.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
It’s not bad
Former Tenant
Pros:
Other than the listed cons the apt is great. Able to hear beautiful piano music most evenings.
Cons:
Did not have gas (useable kitchen) in entire building for 6 months, including over thanksgiving- management did not try to expedite repairs to improve problem. Super does not seem to want to do his job. Avoids fixing issues.
Advice to owner:
Work harder to improve resident concerns.
4.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Nice clean building
Former Tenant
Pros:
No pests, clean and quiet building
Cons:
Super unavailable, sometimes no hot water, noisy radiators
Advice to owner:
A building website/bulletin boardwould be nice to connect neighbors.
4.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Neutral, not memorable
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice Neighbors. Great location
Cons:
Not much community
4.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Good building, great neighborhood
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very quiet, elevator, right next to amazing supermarkets, parks, and subway
Cons:
Broken washing machines, no composting
Advice to owner:
Get composting, fix washers