A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 12 hours ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.74 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 24, 2023: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 2j, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Hazardous
31
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 24, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling and at east wall in the 1st room from north located at apt 4j, 4th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Immediately hazardous
11
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 29, 2023: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... approximately 15 sq ft at ceiling and 15 sq ft at west wall in the bathroom located at apt 2l, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
F
Francis Feldschrieber
3.1(5)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•125 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
M
Manuel Caban
3.1(5)
Site Manager•
1 Property•62 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
F
Francis Feldschneiber
3.1(7)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•112 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
J
Jaime Smith
2.3(6)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•98 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
3.12 stars
6 months ago
It could be better
Former Tenant
Pros:
Love the neighborhood, a large portion of the neighbors are fantastic and it feels like a small community.
Cons:
The super of the building is non-responsive most of the time and does not follow up with calls or notices to inspect problems in the unit. There is a couple that live in one of the units that bring suspicious crowds into the building and are consistently fighting.
Advice to owner:
get a new super, unfortunately not much can be done with the couple in that said unit.
3 stars
Over 2 years ago
Beautiful apartment but non-responsive landlord and super
Former Tenant
Pros:
Large apartments, excellent natural lighting. On a quiet street so little NYC noise. Beautiful courtyard maintained by a tenant who is a landscaper.
Cons:
The landlord is fine to deal with … until you have actual issues. Ongoing water damage? It will need to be fixed several times over (sometimes over the course of years). Pest issues? He will gaslight you that nobody else is having this issue. This is especially true if you have lived there for awhile, because the apartments are rent stabilized and by having you vacate, he can bring the apartment cost up to market value. On top of that, the super is non-responsive and it takes multiple tries to get him to do anything, and often he will leave a job half done and doesn’t clean up the mess he made.
2.83 stars
Over 3 years ago
The worst experience I’ve ever had
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cheap, large rooms, quiet block
Cons:
Very old, blamed for leak in the ceiling, would not fix, threatened to evict us for lying about the leak, super constantly unavailable, landlord is trying to push people out by not fixing anything so he can make money. He was rated on the list of worst landlords a few years ago. MICE. COCKROACHES. no matter how clean we kept it or how many holes we filled. We had to keep all of our open pantry food in the fridge
Advice to owner:
Stop doing illegally things and do something with the hazardous basement
2.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
Apartments are okay
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to the subway, and grocery stores. Large apartments with decent sized closets.
Cons:
Building is poorly maintained. Roach issue in the basement. Getting repairs was like pulling teeth.
3.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Not a well-maintainedbuilding
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighbors very nice
Cons:
Repairs are very shoddy
Advice to owner:
Do better
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here