NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
All Upper Manhattan
/
Marble Hill
/
120-36 West 228 Street
Marble Hill

120-36 West 228 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10463

56 Units

•

Built in 1930

•

6 Floors

2.3(2)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: Yes
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    292 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 1 week ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.23 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    0
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    8
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Dec 19, 2023: § 27-2056.7, 27-2056.17 and 27-2056.8 adm code - certify compliance with lead-based paint hazard control requirements during period of unit vacancy by submitting required supporting documentation and affidavits for apartment located at apt 6j, 6th story, 2nd apartment from west at north
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    5
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Apr 06, 2024: § 27-2056.6 adm code - correct the lead-based paint hazard-paint that is xrf tested inconclusive for lead content at 0.5mg/cm2 and is presumed lead paint as set forth in (28 rcny §11-07(b)) and that is peeling or on a deteriorated subsurface-using work practices set forth in 28 rcny §11-06(b)(2) north wall, 1st window frame from west at north wall in the bathroom located at apt 4i, 4th story, 1st apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    P
    Pk Equities LLC
    2.3(2)
    Owner•
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•138 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 3
    R
    Ramon Then
    2.3(2)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•56 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 1
    M
    Milbrook Properties Ltd
    3.6(21)
    Agent•
    28 Properties•1312 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 45
    R
    Rubin Pikus
    3.2(13)
    Officer•
    Head Officer•
    27 Properties•1270 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 32
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (2)

    Over 1 year ago
    Very poor management
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Close to everything and lots of shops around
    Cons:
    Very dirty building it’s infested with roaches and mouses. Heating is poor. There’s huge rats in the garbage area. Poor management and they don’t do repairs. They don’t care about tenants only about money.
    Advice to owner:
    Follow up with tenants and their complaint regarding maintenance
    Over 2 years ago
    The Building review
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The neighbors are nice
    Cons:
    The maintenance is terrible.
    Advice to owner:
    Get a new super and people that do the job right. Pay attention to the tenants and their apartment issues.