NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
All Upper Manhattan
/
Inwood
/
235 Seaman Avenue
Inwood

235 Seaman Avenue,
Manhattan, NY 10034

52 Units

•

Built in 1935

•

6 Floors

2.9(2)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 1 week ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    3.26 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    39
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 16, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... less than 10 sq fts at west wall in the bathroom located at bsmt-apt d, 1st bsmt-apt from south at west
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    106
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 17, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color all walls and ceiling in the 3rd bathroom from north at west located at apt 1l, 2nd story, 1st apartment from west at north
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    25
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 30, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt a, 1st story, 1st apartment from west at north
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    C
    Christian Kumbullaj
    2.9(2)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•52 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    J
    John Satriale Jr
    2.9(2)
    Officer•
    1 Property•52 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    P
    Paul Kaplan
    2.9(2)
    Shareholder•
    Head Officer•
    1 Property•52 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    H
    Hawthorne Assoc. LLC
    2.9(2)
    Corporate Owner•
    1 Property•52 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 1
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (2)

    Over 3 years ago
    Slow response and patchy fixes
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The lobby is nice and clean and the apartments are spacious for the low price.
    Cons:
    Major pest and structural issues. Management is often slow to respond to tenant complaints, and fixes are often patchy and don’t address the underlying problems. Extermination services are also inconsistent.
    Over 3 years ago
    Good building. Terrible management.
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Large pre-war units
    Cons:
    Not maintained properly. Pest issues. Structural issues
    Advice to owner:
    Repair units properly instead of constantly pushing for short term patchwork.
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here