261 Seaman Avenue,
Manhattan, NY 10034

73 Units

Built in 1927

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.3 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 15, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the ceiling at public hall, 6th story, 1st section from west at north
Show all
flag
Hazardous
16
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 15, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardant material at the ceiling at public hall, 6th story, 1st section from west at north
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 20, 2023: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective at entrance to building , 1st story, section at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
S
215 & Seaman Associates
3.4(7)
Owner
Corporate Owner
Agent
11 Properties447 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
S
261/271 Seaman Avenue
4.3(4)
Owner
Corporate Owner
Agent
2 Properties125 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
R
Rosette Moskowitz
3.4(7)
Head Officer
11 Properties447 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
E
Edgardo Garay
4.3(4)
Site Manager
1 Property73 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

10 months ago
Remarkably large apartments if you can make the commute work
Former Tenant
Pros:
Huge apartments with excellent kitchens. A lot of original details in the plaster walls. Nice enough renovations of an older building.
Cons:
Some neighbors could be noisy and it's quite a hike being at the absolute upper tip of Manhattan
Over 2 years ago
Good memories
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building was quiet and I felt safe entering it late at night. There weren’t people hanging in the lobby. My apartment was pretty quiet. I had an apartment towards the back of the building. My kitchen, bathroom and living room windows faced the inner courtyard and the garbage dumpsters. My bedroom windows faced the back of the building and a gray stone wall. Unfortunately, it didn’t get a lot of sunlight, but it did get an excessive amount of heat. I was never cold in that apartment! I would leave the windows open throughout winter that’s how hot it was. My apartment was small but perfectly sized for me and my neighbors were generally quiet.
Cons:
The only issue I had with my apartment was that I occasionally saw large roaches or water bugs in my apartment. I distinctly remember 3 separate occasions. They were always in or around my closets so I made sure to shake everything out. The first time I saw one I freaked out and could barely bring myself to enter my apartment because it was on the door of the foyer closet. The second time, it or one of its relatives, was in the closet between my bedroom and bathroom and I wasn’t fast enough to get it. The third time I saw one I was dead set on not being scared to live in my own apartment and I ripped my closet apart until I got that sucker. All in all, 3 times in about 4 years that I lived there is actually pretty good. I never saw small roaches in my kitchen. That would’ve been disgusting. I think my unfortunate apartment location overlooking the dumpster had something to do with the large roaches aka water bugs.

I left because the rent was just getting too high and I got a better offer closer to my job. Unfortunately, my new apartment was in a private house overlooking the Throgs Neck Bridge and it was always cold and the house owner was cheap with the heat. I regretted moving many, many times.
Advice to owner:
Keep maintaining the property well and get an exterminator regularly.
Over 2 years ago
Great Location
Former Tenant
Pros:
While the building is a little dated (our unit still has fuses and a flushometer) the elevator and basement access were a huge bonus when we moved in. Pet friendly without the fees and proximity to park are ideal for dog owners. Super is attentive and always available.
Cons:
While the outdoor noise is avoidable, you can easily hear lower level neighbors television in hardwood areas. Invest in rugs. Construction scaffolding and netting in the courtyard has allegedly been up for years and the facade of the building really suffers from it. Electrical in the units are dated but functional. Seem to always be waiting for a response from the property owner for certain fixes (read: electrical).
Advice to owner:
Remove the scaffolding and netting to allow some of the greenery to return. Update electrical.
Over 3 years ago
Love it here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Super is amazing.
Cons:
Property company sucks but you don’t have to deal with them a lot.
Advice to owner:
Update the building. It’s falling apart.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here