560 West 218 Street,Manhattan, NY 10034
43 Units
•Built in 1939
•6 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.06 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 06, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling in the private hallway located at apt 2e, 2nd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 03, 2021: § 27-2005 hmc: immediately provide a fire guard as directed by the nyc dept. of housing preservation & development (hpd) and/or the nyc dept. of buildings (dob) to protect against fire hazards observed by hpd and/or dob. fire hazards observed by hpd have resulted in the following additional hpd violation(s): ..viol.14536048... collapsed retaining wall at east yard obstructing egress. . in order to protect public safety against imminent fire hazards observed, a fire guard must be provided forthwith for continuous 24 hour coverage, notwithstanding the correction and certification dates set forth above (the correction and certification dates set forth above are applicable for purposes of civil penalties that may be assessed pursuant to nyc administrative code § 27-2115, but do not reflect the date by which a fire guard must be provided). a fire guard must be provided immediately due to the exigency of the dangerous fire hazard conditions observed. the violation requiring a fire guard to be provided will remain open until such time as the fire hazards resulting in the hpd violation(s) referenced above and/or the fire hazards resulting in related dob violation(s) have been dismissed.
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Arsale Realty Company LLC
3.9(276)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
76 Properties•9706 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 98
S
Salear Realty CO LLC
3.3(3)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•94 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
R
Rose Property Mgmt Grp LLC
3.6(204)
Agent•
46 Properties•7034 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 73
M
Michael Goldstein
3.3(7)
Head Officer•
4 Properties•263 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
2.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
GREAT AT THE BEGINNING
Former Tenant
Pros:
GREAT AT THE BEGINNING BUT...
Cons:
THEY HAD AN OLDER LADY AS THE "SUPER" SHE DID NOTHING MOPED THE LOBBY EVERY FEW WEEKS. SHE HAD WEIRD PICS AND THINGS IN THE BASEMENT. THE BUILDING SLOWLY GOT A HUGE WATER BUG INFESTATION IT WAS HORRIBLE.
3.12 stars
Over 1 year ago
Once a very good building
Former Tenant
Pros:
My unit is very big (and not just by NYC standards), the bathroom and kitchen were completely renovated and upgraded before I moved in.
Super is very nice and responsive.
Neighborhood is great - quiet residential area with an incredible park just steps away.
Super is very nice and responsive.
Neighborhood is great - quiet residential area with an incredible park just steps away.
Cons:
I can hear EVERYTHING from my immediate neighbors. And NOT because I have very loud neighbors, but because of poor noise insulation and/or the way the building was constructed. I'm hearing just everyday activity very clearly through the walls & ceilings. I'm not exaggerating when I say I can hear their sneezes and their every step. I can also clearly hear the elevator motor and whenever the elevator door opens and shuts. A couple of years ago, the live-in super retired and it took months before they hired a new super (but one who is only at the building during regular business hours, and doesn't live in the building). During the time when the building was without a super, things deteriorated a bit. The new super is very nice and responsive but I feel like the building never fully recovered to the state it was in when we had a live-in super.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here