A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.01 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 25, 2023: § 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
4
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jul 13, 2023: § 27-2005 hmc: refit door. in the entrance located at apt 9d, 9th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 13, 2023: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 9d, 9th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
I
Izzy Betancourt
3(2)
Site Manager•
2 Properties•600 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
B
Brendan Keany
3(2)
Officer•
2 Properties•600 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
M
Matthew Jones
3(2)
Head Officer•
2 Properties•600 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
M
Matthew Klein
3(2)
Head Officer•
2 Properties•600 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great place
Former Tenant
Pros:
The neighborhood and building are great, no complaints
Cons:
my specific landlord wasn't the most responsive, but that's apartment specific - maintenance was operated by the building so everything was great!
Advice to owner:
Depends on the unit really
1 stars
Over 3 years ago
Cigarette smell
Former Tenant
Pros:
Historic building, swimming pool
Cons:
I'm forced to break the lease after 2 months of living in the unit 3I, owned by Joel Rentlzer because of secondhand smoking. The landlord hasn't taken any actions within 30 days of being notified, and yet he's threatening he'll report me to credit agencies if I don't continue paying the rent. He's supposed to be a professor at Baruch college, but unfortunately he’s more of a mafia.
Advice to owner:
Don’t be a mafia
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here