A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.01 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Dec 16, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at ceiling in the private hallway located at apt 14m, 14th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Hazardous
2
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 16, 2024: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). defective in the entire apartment located at apt 14m, 14th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 16, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 14m, 14th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
G
Gregg Wolpert
3.5(6)
Officer•
2 Properties•394 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 11
A
Arsale Realty Company LLC
3.9(275)
Corporate Owner•
76 Properties•9706 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 98
R
Richard Czaja
3.8(9)
Head Officer•
3 Properties•544 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 15
B
Brian Paljevic
3.5(6)
Site Manager•
2 Properties•394 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 11
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
3.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
perfectly adequate place
Former Tenant
Pros:
Quiet, residential neighborhood. Often can get electricity and/or gas included in rent.
Cons:
Building is pre-war and quite old. Layouts are not conventional and sometimes quite odd.
1.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
If you like neighbors who harass you and vermin
Former Tenant
Pros:
Apartments are really spacious
Cons:
Management is corrupt and abusive. So are the owners. Some of the people that live here are certified psychotic and allowed to get away with literal murder because of rent control. They let one girl shoot up in empty apartments and run a prostitution ring from her apartment bc she paid her rent on time. That was fun. If you need to question their morals- google the owners… Stahl and Hirschfeld, the partners who tried to kill each other via hitman. I thought things would be different since that was decades ago. Boy was I wrong.
Advice to owner:
Stop taking bribes. Stop allowing neighbors to harass tenants using racial slurs and violence. Stop hiding behind your army of lawyers. The buildings you manage and own are architectural gems and they and the people in them deserve better
4.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great Building & location
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great staff, clean building
Cons:
Hot water sometimes takes a while to get warm.
2.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Landlord and management company are horrendous
Former Tenant
Pros:
Decent pre-war building, Mostly nice doormen, Quieter location of city.
Cons:
Rare / none response from maintenance and management of building. If you have any issues, plan on living with them.
Advice to owner:
Time for an overhaul in terms of your staff. This pertains to all aspects of the building management company.
4.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Staff great.. management…much to be desired
Former Tenant
Pros:
Friendly staff, always clean
Cons:
Unresponsive management, logistical nightmare
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here