NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
Midtown East
/
Kips Bay
/
300 East 34 Street - Long Island City

300 East 34 Street - Long Island City,
Manhattan, NY 10016

355 Units

Built in 1974

36 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 5
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: Yes
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 300 East 34 Street - Long Island City
unit
Kips Bay
300 East 34 Street #22D
$8,316
2 beds2 bathsEst. Jan 2025
Future
unit
Kips Bay
300 East 34 Street #18H
$4,908
1 bed1 bathEst. Jan 2025
Future
unit
Kips Bay
300 East 34 Street #4F
$5,544
1 bed1 bathEst. Feb 2025
Future
unit
Kips Bay
300 East 34 Street #29K
$4,125
Studio1 bathEst. Feb 2025
Future
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
K
Kbl 51st Street Limited Partnership
4.2(24)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties474 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 7
H
Hkal 34th Street Limited Partnership
4.4(58)
Top Rated
Corporate Owner
11 Properties1510 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 23
T
The Glen Associates LLC
4.2(20)
Corporate Owner
3 Properties497 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 10
A
Alfredo Cifuentes
4.2(20)
Site Manager
1 Property355 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (20)

2 months ago
Good building with attentive staff
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice apartments with in-unit controllable A/C and heat, spacious layouts, attentive staff, great amenities (gym, pool)
Cons:
There can be a lot of noise from people blasting music and management does little about it besides calling them and asking them to quiet down, even after multiple issues. Rent is getting pricey. The pool is not open to guests on the weekends during the summer.
5 months ago
Served us well for a couple of years
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very nice building itself with amazing door men and staff! Beautiful rooftop. Any maintenance issues we had were dealt with very quickly too.
Cons:
-Could be loud, at the time there was a bunch of construction on the 2nd floor of the building, and so hardcore drilling during the day that was very annoying. Also with ambulances due to nearby hospital which I eventually drowned out.
-Ended up becoming very expensive: had to pay over $500 per tenant to be able to access the pool of the building that we paid to live in? Thought that was ridiculous, and had someone sit and ask for IDs at the door too during the summer season. Considering the rent was being raised with no further updates to the units, that was ridiculous and whenever I would share that with friends/family they were appalled.
-I want to preface that we had moved in mid-pandemic, but our rent was raised over $2k per month over 2 years. Keep in mind no updates or changes to our unit. Even though that was sort of common at the time, still feel like that is not ethical business practice. And again, when sharing that with friends/family, again appalled.
5 months ago
Great building, responsive management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Beautiful rooftop pool, large apartments, pet friendly, management is responsive to service requests
Cons:
- the pool rules are very restrictive, not allowing guests on weekends or holidays and requiring additional payment for guests in addition the ~500 we already pay for pool access, if you don’t pay for a pool pass, the rooftop is closed to you from 10-7pm everyday of the summer/pool season even as a resident.

- we had multiple issues of our ceiling paint peeling in the bathroom. Management fixed it but it kept happening
6 months ago
Great building and view
Former Tenant
Pros:
Friendly staff, well maintained building. Extremely clean.
Cons:
Better instructions for different processes, how to get packages etc
Advice to owner:
Good job overall
6 months ago
loved living here
Former Tenant
Pros:
clean and pretty
Cons:
heating bill was too high
10 months ago
Great building to live in
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building management is very responsive and overall things are well maintained
Cons:
It's VERY noisy. Since it's near the hospitals, there are often ambulances and there's a looot of street traffic and noise. I had to train myself to sleep through the noise
Over 1 year ago
Really great building!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great management, responsive staff, excellent gym/facilities
Cons:
Lots of noise on street bc busy area
Over 1 year ago
Love this building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doormen, large apartments, pool, renovated spaces, responsiveness
Cons:
Cockroaches a few times but usually dead
Over 1 year ago
Average
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good gym rooftop pool
Cons:
Very young rent keeps raising
Over 1 year ago
Nice building and well maintained but loud frat kids
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building is in a solid location, well-maintained and clean, apartments are spacious and the maintenance staff is hardworking and friendly.
Cons:
There are far too many noisy and irresponsible fresh out of college kids who treat it like a dorm and have no respect or consideration for neighbors. Parties and noise happen all week long with little courtesy.
Over 2 years ago
Murray hill apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Always clean. Quick to respond to maintenance requests.
Cons:
A few of the doormen are very rude, which sours this review. It’s unfortunate because most of them are amazing but the very few rude ones are so horrible it can ruin your day. Laundry room gets dirty sometimes.
Over 2 years ago
Luxury building with responsive management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Responsive management, sophisticated tenant resources such as an intranet to sell or give things to other tenants within the building
Cons:
Noisy sometimes as it’s a lot of young people so there were often parties on weekends. Did find roaches a couple of times.
Over 3 years ago
Very Noisy street
Former Tenant
Pros:
Large apartments east to flex
Cons:
Busy street near hospitals and tunnel entrance
Over 3 years ago
Great building for the area
Former Tenant
Pros:
Responsive maintenance people
Great amenities
Nice renovations
Cons:
Not welcoming doormen
Package room hours
Stubborn super
Over 3 years ago
Great Building ran well
Former Tenant
Pros:
Staff amenities hear
Cons:
None none none
Advice to owner:
All was good!
Over 3 years ago
Beautiful property, accounting for fools
Former Tenant
Pros:
The rooftop is amazing, lobby is nice, apartment is good size, love the doormen, helpful when have any problem coming and fixing it
Cons:
They charge you 100 dollars every time you get locked out even though they say it’s on the weekend. Then they accidentally charge you more and say you owe money that was not clearly laid out on the ledger because the technology their using for accounting and to pay rent looks like it was calculated by a third grader. My toilet has been broken for a year and randomly will overflow, and they always come and fix it but it breaks monthly.
Advice to owner:
Get a better accounting software or portal so it is transparent what you need to pay for utilities, lock out fees, random charges - etc. I was once accidentally charged twice for rent in one month and if I didn’t notice, it would not have been removed.
Over 3 years ago
Great building, terrible management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great rooftop, gym, location, overall condition of building and apartments.
Cons:
Lee Rosen is an absolutely terrible property manager and landlord. He is beyond rude and virtually unresponsive when there are any issues or questions with the apartment. He has been with the Kibel company for so long that he does not care about ruining relationships with tenants because he is essentially tenured.

Street noise is very loud on lower floors.
Advice to owner:
Provide other people within the management office that tenants can work with so Lee can be monitored and tenants have options to work with a management liaison that suits them better.
Over 3 years ago
Bad doormen and lot of construction
Former Tenant
Pros:
Pool and rooftop
Cons:
Expensive and long lines for elevator
Advice to owner:
Nothing
Over 3 years ago
I like this building!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator, doorman, pool, rooftop, package services, gym, nice lobby
Cons:
We have seen cockroaches, finishes aren’t very new
Over 3 years ago
Great Staff, Terrible Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The doormen are absolutely fantastic, the common roof is unbeatable, and the price was within reason.
Cons:
Cockroaches only a weekly basis, didn’t have gas (which affected the stove and dishwasher) for four months while living there. Management did nothing about this and refused to offer tenants any form of rent reduction. If it wasn’t for these two massive issues, I would have stayed a few more years. But I lived there two years and a quarter of that I couldn’t use majority of my kitchen.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here