NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
Upper East Side
/
Lenox Hill
/
355 East 72 Street
Lenox Hill

355 East 72 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10021

144 Units

•

Built in 1962

•

19 Floors

3.9(4)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Available Listings In 355 East 72 Street
    unit
    Lenox Hill
    355 East 72 Street #PH-1
    $34,650
    4 beds•5 baths•Est. Mar 2025
    Future
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    205 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 5 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.01 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    0
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    1
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 30, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective caulking around the bathtub in the bathroom located at apt 3j, 3rd story, 1st apartment from south at west
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    1
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 30, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 3j, 3rd story, 1st apartment from south at west
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    A
    Ahron Freidus
    3.9(4)
    Agent•
    1 Property•144 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    D
    Duvi Peralta
    3.9(4)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•144 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    K
    Keshala Halangoda
    3.3(114)
    Head Officer•
    69 Properties•2185 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 32
    E
    235 E. 12 Realty LLC
    3.3(113)
    Corporate Owner•
    69 Properties•2173 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 33
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (4)

    5 months ago
    Lots of potential but the building is cheap
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Location is great, apartments are spacious, doormen are friendly and know each tenant
    Cons:
    The craftsmanship is horrible... everything in the apartment was very shoddily done (uneven walls, cabinets not adhered properly, sinks and toilets not caulked properly, etc.). Very difficult to contact building management which seems purposeful (who still uses fax machines and doesn't have an email address in 2024?)
    Advice to owner:
    Hire better contractors
    Over 2 years ago
    Not too bad
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Building staff (with the exception of John)
    Cons:
    Will under no circumstance turn AC on prior to Memorial Day. Even if it is 90+ degrees, so can be unlivable conditions.
    Advice to owner:
    Be more responsive to tenants needs and requests.
    Over 2 years ago
    Great experience living here
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Friendly, responsive and clean
    Cons:
    Noisy if apartment is facing 1st Ave
    Over 2 years ago
    Bang for your buck
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Good bang for your buck. Is cheaper than most buildings for size of apartments. Apartments are a good size, but some are not renovated. If you have lived in your apartment for a long time without renovations they will try and charge you the same “market value” as a nicely renovated apartment.
    Cons:
    See above. Not all apartments are renovated, and they will charge the same amount for renovated vs non renovated.