235 East 95 Street,Manhattan, NY 10128
387 Units
•Built in 1986
•32 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.08 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
8
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 01, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
Hazardous
10
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 06, 2024: (b) 27-2142(a) hmc: the following dwelling units were reoccupied while being subject to an order to repair/vacate order issued by the department; file for a dismissal request related to the issued order (see www.nyc.gov/hpd). in the entire apartment located at apt 24b, 23rd story, 4th apartment from east at south , section ''225''
Show all
Immediately hazardous
5
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Apr 15, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 29m, 29th story, 4th apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
11
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 22, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
J
John Mcdermott
4.1(44)
Head Officer•
4 Properties•792 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
M
M F Associates Of New York LLC
4.1(44)
Corporate Owner•
4 Properties•792 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
Y
Yorkville Land Assoc LLC
4.1(61)
Corporate Owner•
5 Properties•1175 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 11
O
Ogden Cap Properties LLC
4(63)
Agent•
7 Properties•1830 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 15
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (11)
2.5 stars
2 weeks ago
Overpriced for old building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, access to subwa
Cons:
Normandie Court is great on paper. Nice kitchens, good location, building amenities.
All of the amenities cost extra and the gym facilities were old and not worth it. The elevators were constantly breaking down. The walls were paper thin and facing 96th street near the hospital was terrible. They kept raising our rent ($600+ in one year) with no upgrades or changes. Not worth it!
All of the amenities cost extra and the gym facilities were old and not worth it. The elevators were constantly breaking down. The walls were paper thin and facing 96th street near the hospital was terrible. They kept raising our rent ($600+ in one year) with no upgrades or changes. Not worth it!
4 stars
2 months ago
Ok building for the price
Former Tenant
Pros:
Maintenance is great. Responsive and quick. Management is a nightmare . Gym is clean package room
Cons:
Management a nightmare. Elevators always broken. Gym equipment always faulty. The outside of the building filthy.
Advice to owner:
Invest on cleaning the outside for the price they charge per apartment
4.38 stars
Over 1 year ago
Fine place to live!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good facilities and gym
Cons:
Expensive and large rent hike!
4.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Great building, highly recommend
Former Tenant
Pros:
- Doormen are super friendly
- Very clean
- Very clean
Cons:
- Elevator takes forever
- Sirens outside are very loud
- Sirens outside are very loud
Advice to owner:
- Add elevator status numbers on all floors. So you can see when the elevator is coming.
4.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great building for young professionals
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location to Q train and Central Park. Affordable rents in a traditionally expensive area.
Cons:
Elevators are terrible. Go down about once a week. Neighborhood borders a slightly sketchier part of town, but rarely have issues.
Advice to owner:
Fix the elevators for good
4.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Going to miss this apartment!
Former Tenant
Pros:
They run a tight ship here and it doesn't go unnoticed. Staff are all friendly and extremely helpful. Maintenance issues are promptly addressed. Packages never lost. Spare key at front desk is handy. Great closet space. Quiet neighbors.
Cons:
While this is not unique to this building, the rent for my unit was just raised more than 20%. While rents everywhere are at an all time high, this seems extreme as I was already paying market rate. (I had to move out for unrelated reasons, but I'm not sure I would have paid the new price.)
Advice to owner:
I hope you show your staff the appreciation they deserve, because they do a fantastic job!
4.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Cost-efficient luxury building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good luxury amenities, service, and allows flex walls
Cons:
Elevators are often slow and backed up
4.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Love living here
Former Tenant
Pros:
No Rodents or pests in my three years of living here! Clean building, trash chutes on every floor to make taking out the trash easy, laundry in building, and management is responsive.
Cons:
Elevators can be slow
4.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
Not much to say
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to public transit, lots of amenities, pleasant enough staff.
Cons:
Too few working elevators for a building of it's size
5 stars
Over 3 years ago
235 E 95
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doorman, laundry, train
Cons:
Rent, elevators, parking
4.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Normandie court building 235
Former Tenant
Pros:
Maintenance comes within the day usually
Cons:
Management sucks and is cheap. The ac floods often. It has leaked all over my floor and my roommates floor. They had to replace the whole floor and management would not pay for my damaged carpet to be replaced. In the summer the floors also come up off the ground. So our entire apartment has now had the floors replaced. Super inconvenient. Rooftop not included unless you are a member of the gym. Only building I’ve ever seen that.
Advice to owner:
Treat your tenants with respect and don’t cheap out on the kitchen and floors. It probably costs you more money to pay someone to come fix everything all the time.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here