90 Beekman St,
Manhattan, NY 10038

63 Units

Built in 1971

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.06 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Feb 08, 2016: § 27-2104 adm code post and maintain a proper sign on wall of entrance story showing the registration number assigned by the department and the address of the building. at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
1
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Mar 28, 2017: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color ceiling in the kitchen located at apt 2d, 2nd story, apartment at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Mar 28, 2017: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak ceiling in the kitchen located at apt 2d, 2nd story, apartment at east
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
N
Nora Ostrovsky
3.8(2)
Head Officer
10 Properties1651 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
S
Southbridge Towers;incorporated
3.8(2)
Corporate Owner
10 Properties1651 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
A
Arben Xhabrahim
3.8(2)
Site Manager
10 Properties1651 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
L
Lancel Kolb
3.8(2)
Officer
10 Properties1651 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (1)

Over 2 years ago
Great area
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great People great area to live
Cons:
The building owners do not take care of there plumbing hot water holding tanks which causes the hot water to run for at least 45 min the color of rust like brown urinate if you live in any of the Southbridge Towers Building in the downtown Manhattan area 10038 I would suggest installing a good drinking water filter such as an RO filter the management team is constantly functioning in the red and the cost of the mismanagement is bringing up the Mantnance but only to the individuals in the development who can afford it by bring up the cost of all the amenities such as Parking, storage, & renting gathering areas some and not all had to pay an additional 5000.00 + in Maintnance because of the mismanagement
Advice to owner:
Stop mismanaging the property your going to bankrupt the Southbridge Towers development and every tenant should be subject to pay there fair share. The biggest problem is management taking orders from politically picked representative of the development these individuals don’t have the best interest of the people or individuals in the development just bending the rules for themselves to make money or just represent 1/4 of the development
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here