A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.05 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 14, 2019: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department north wall at public hall, 3rd story, section at east
Show all
Hazardous
4
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 02, 2019: § 27-2005 adm code properly secure the loose banister hanging at public hall stairs, 2nd story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
1
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 01, 2017: § 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system ... at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
Z
Zdzislaw Oleszek
3.3(25)
Site Manager•
1 Property•190 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
B
160 Bleecker Street Owners Corp.
3.6(32)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•272 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
C
Chaim Babad
3.3(69)
Agent•
Head Officer•
40 Properties•2765 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 37
E
310 East 55th Street
3.3(69)
Corporate Owner•
39 Properties•2762 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 37
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (25)
4.12 stars
2 months ago
I liked it
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building could be better maintained but I had a good experience living there, low noise leve
Cons:
Maintenance of building, but mostly bugged me bc it’s a historical building so
Advice to owner:
Nothing
2.62 stars
4 months ago
Not a great place
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, most of the doormen are nice
Cons:
One of the doormen and the super are incredibly rude
3.25 stars
8 months ago
Mean people work here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean, good area (but loud), elevators
Cons:
Building is run by mean awful people. From the super to the doormen to the management company - everyone is terrible and unhelpful. Weird random rules too.
Advice to owner:
Hire nicer people
3.75 stars
10 months ago
4 Year tenant
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doorman + Elevator
Cons:
Rats, bugs, slow elevators
Advice to owner:
N/A
4 stars
Over 1 year ago
Great location, cute appartments
Former Tenant
Pros:
Really cute, newly renovated studio apartment. The doorman are great.
Cons:
Management is straight up mean and maintenance people are horrible. However, if something truly needs to get done, they do it in a timely manor. They kind of reprimand you for asking for anything though.
4.38 stars
Over 1 year ago
Enjoyed my time here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doorman were nice, quiet building
Cons:
There were very small trash chutes
4.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
good for nyu students
Former Tenant
Pros:
laundry, space, and nice doormen. No pest issues experienced on top floor
Cons:
extremely outdated amenities that caused maintenance issues, particularly a/c issues
3.12 stars
Over 1 year ago
A POS w few perks
Former Tenant
Pros:
-most doormen r amazing -affordable for area -neighbors are good -great shower pressure
great doormen, quiet, nice tenants, good water pressure. great area
Cons:
bad heat, freezing or very hot. pests- hear mice in the walls + roaches. sink clogs etc.
3.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
Outdated but it’s ok
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doormen and elevator are great. Large apartments and bedrooms. Location is incredible
Cons:
Cockroaches, washer dryers expensive and break, super is rude, outdated apartments. SCAFFOLDING UP FOREVER
3.38 stars
Over 1 year ago
Good for a starter apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
The elevator , security and laundry are rare finds for the area at this price point
Cons:
One of the doorman, Barry, is very hard to deal with. Mice and cockroach problem!
Advice to owner:
Hire a new super who isn’t an ass, get larger garbage shoots so the nice and bugs go away
2 stars
Over 2 years ago
Babad Management is BAD BAD
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good Location !
Cons:
The building had a mouse infestation for almost a year and did little to fix the situation in the beginning. It wasn't until neighbors were calling 311 and getting the city involved that they took action. Management is greedy and has continued to raise rent by over 30% annually.
Advice to owner:
Take care of your renters, LISTEN and speak to renters with respect. Stop overcharging for outdated apartments just because you can.
2.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Horrible Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
This building in is a great location and the doormen are great.
Cons:
We lived here for two years and every winter we had mice problem. The management company has extremely limited hours and took a long time to respond. It was a building wide problem, the exterminator told us that it came from garbage in the basement. Whenever we needed repairs they would do the absolute bare minimum after a lot of back and fourth.
Advice to owner:
Better response time
3.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
not that bad
Former Tenant
Pros:
lobby is clean, friendly doorman
Cons:
lots of garbage pileup, elevators wait is long
2.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Rude Super & Hasn't Improved Since the 19th Century
Former Tenant
Pros:
I like the full time Doormen, most of them are decently nice. Laundry on every floor is good too. They also have an "atrium" gathering area where you can hang out on the mezzanine that looks very nice, but I never used it.
Cons:
The super is the most unpleasant person on the planet, be warned. He's rude if not outright mean, unwilling to help, takes forever to fix things. The AC also constantly breaks and getting them to fix it usually involves lots of emails and threats. Every summer almost everyone's AC doesn't blow cold air, even though they supposedly do maintenance on it every year right before they turn it on. They don't even turn the AC on until late May so if you prefer a cooler environment tough luck. If you want maintenance done you have to write it in a composition book at the front. No emails or texts and they don't tell you when they're coming, they just do. Very old school management, no technology involved. They leave paper letters and such instead. You can only move out and in on weekdays as well. It's also an old building so the floors are creaky and the doorways are small. My apartment didn't even have a ceiling light in my bedroom so it was pitch dark until I got a lamp. While I was there, there was also a rat infestation.
Advice to owner:
Unless you're in a pinch, I'd look elsewhere. Be prepared it's very old school and the super is unpleasant. The neighbors have been decently friendly though.
2.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Poorly run college doem
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location near NYU
Cons:
Horrific management company, no maintenance in the building. The doorman also told me the throw out packages left unclaimed after 2 weeks. One doorman also punched a delivery driver and kept his job. Insane.
2.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
It was okay
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice doormen and relatively affordable
Cons:
Ownership didn't always respond and there were always small leaks or pest issues. They were typically addressed after a little bit but we had multiple leak issues during our lease term
3.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Amazing location but management unresponsive
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location location location, reasonable price and lots of laundry on each floor
Cons:
Doormen not super friendly, management rude, also had occasional critters.
3.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
Nice doorman building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good sunlight on the south facing side
Cons:
Poor management, unresponsive and rude
3.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Great with some headaches
Former Tenant
Pros:
Friendly front door people, ideal location, no issues with heat/AC
Cons:
Elevators frequently out of service, noisy neighborhood, trash rooms were filthy, no package notification system so unexpected packages (like gifts) may get sent back by building
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here