A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.19 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 04, 2017: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair the broken or defective bell/buzzer/intercom system from building front entrance to apartment in the entire apartment located at apt lc, 1st story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Hazardous
5
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 31, 2020: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... north wall approx 6 sq ft and east wall approx 4 sq ft in the kitchen located at apt 4c, 4th story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 05, 2023: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective defective hinges at laundry room, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
S
410 St Nicholas Property LLC
3.2(31)
Corporate Owner•
4 Properties•311 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 8
E
Elizabeth Rivera
3.2(31)
Agent•
Head Officer•
4 Properties•311 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 8
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
It Will Do
Former Tenant
Pros:
Not much noise when going to bed, my neighbor is nice, new appliances
Cons:
Had two roaches in my apartment and I screamed like a child. Can’t do bugs. But idk if they have a problem. Also, gotta pay for laundry which is stupid.
3.38 stars
Over 3 years ago
Mostly satisfied, but management can be better
Former Tenant
Pros:
Landlord has been actively putting in work to upgrade the building (recently the lobby was painted and re-floored, and the mailboxes were upgraded); superintendent is very responsive and helpful to issues; able to pay rent through portal online
Cons:
Elevator goes out of service very often, intercom goes out of service pretty often, on-site property manager does not work very hard to respond to tenant issues in a timely manner
Advice to owner:
Would look at hiring a new on-site manager who is more responsive to tenant issues
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here