See all complaints about this building in a rental report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
R
Robert Ezrapour
3.9(2)
Head Officer•
3 Properties•85 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
K
K & R Realty Management Inc
3.4(27)
Agent•
19 Properties•721 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 12
J
Jgm 149th LLC
3.8(49)
Corporate Owner•
46 Properties•1006 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 10
J
Juan Lima
3.9(2)
Site Manager•
2 Properties•75 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Miss this place
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doorman buildings at the rent they charge are hard to find. Love having the courtyard and many units have balconies. The doormen are great for the most part. Nice location in Harlem with lots to do but not overly congested. Bedroom and storage space is much more ample than many other buildings in the area. Units are reserved for people with families so the neighbors are very quiet and respectful. No crazy party neighbors etc.
Cons:
Really bad property managers.They have a lot of obnoxious move out rules that seem to be in place just to cost you more money. Laundry room is terrible. Machines smell like mold a number of the machines are broken. There is a night club that can be disruptive for units on the courtyard side. I also waited nearly 6 months to have my dishwasher replaced and the super seems to be under direction to do everything to save the owners money. I experienced a great deal of resistance trying to get them to replace broken sink and bath tube fixtures. I also felt like the electric wiring was subpar because I often had issues my clippers shorting out the bathroom outlet. I’m general not much of anything has been updated since the buildings erection which is disappointing.
Advice to owner:
Do more to leave residents with a positive impression upon moving out. Be more proactive with appliance repairs and building upkeep. I also think it’s cruel to force residents to pay for the entire month if staying past the 5th of the month.
4 stars
Over 2 years ago
average
Former Tenant
Pros:
our neighbors, had a nice community feel
Cons:
the superintendent was rude, threatening and not responsive for issues. the management company was average.