220 West 26 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10001

125 Units

•

Built in 2000

•

11 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
18 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
logo
Kamran Elghanayan
4.5(211)
Top Rated•
Shareholder•
Head Officer•
17 Properties•4701 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 45
logo
Frederick Elghanayan
4.5(289)
Top Rated•
Shareholder•
Officer•
22 Properties•7226 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 76
T
Theodore Paolini
4.7(3)
Site Manager•
1 Property•125 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
W
200-220 West 26 LLC
4.7(86)
Top Rated•
Corporate Owner•
4 Properties•1006 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

Over 1 year ago
Chelsea Centro Review
Former Tenant
Pros:
Amazing staff and facilities
Cons:
No sink garbage disposal switch
Over 1 year ago
The doormen and staff are fantastic
Former Tenant
Pros:
I love living here . Great building , close to the hudson , great access to nearby restaurants , and subway & Penn Station. ..such an easy place to live for me 🥰
Get around by bike or scooter. As I get older the building is very accessible for me to stores & restaurants . Pretty quiet considering it’s on 7th ave and across from a Studio TV location .
Staff / doorman are just wonderful !!
Cons:
I wish there was room in the garage to park a bike or scooter instead of my apartment .
Advice to owner:
Look into gaining some access for bike storage in the garage under the building
Over 2 years ago
“Luxe” Rental
Former Tenant
Pros:
The doormen are caring and helpful, the rooftop is huge, the common areas are clean, and the location is great.
Cons:
A lot of money for a very standard “luxury” rental.
Advice to owner:
Redo the lobby…the last redo was not good.