A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.73 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
6
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 08, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective caulk around the bathtub in the bathroom located at apt 32a, 3rd story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Hazardous
21
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 21, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective ceramic floor tiles in the kitchen located at apt 31a, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
19
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 24, 2024: § 27-2029 adm code provide an adequate supply of heat for the apartment in the entire apartment located at apt 43b, 4th story, 1st apartment from west at north , section at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
P
Parkash 4769 LLC
2.3(44)
Corporate Owner•
57 Properties•3687 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 692
P
Parkash 2115 LLC
1.7(6)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•125 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 53
V
Ved Parkash
2.3(44)
Site Manager•
Agent•
Head Officer•
59 Properties•3802 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 552
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (1)
1.83 stars
Over 3 years ago
Unfortunately still here.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Precinct across the street. Tenants are nice. Live in super is okay.
Cons:
46th precinct across the street doesn’t allow pedestrians and neighboring tenants to walk the sidewalk safely because they don’t know how to park correctly. Has to walk on street towards incoming traffic if trying to enter the building after getting out a cab, because officers have barricades that allows them to park illegally on sidewalk. Elevator doesn’t always work in the summer time, intercom doesn’t work for some of the apartments, it’s not a clean buildings. Rat, roach and fly infested, un-attentively managed. Oh, and the streets majority of the time have fecal matter. Many more problems with this building.
Advice to owner:
When Tenants call the landlords office to get a job done that by law you are required to fix have a better attitude towards them, they pay you every month to live in your buildings that are clearly badly taken care off. Invest in your property, making thousands of dollars a month from renting outdated, and patched work jobs on apartment.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here