A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.05 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 16, 2023: § 27-2042 adm code provide a mirror in self-service elevator arranged so as to enable a person entering, to view inside of elevator number 2p1656
Show all
Hazardous
46
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 09, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective latch and assembly at 2nd fire door from north at public hall, 4th story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
22
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 02, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges at fire door at public hall, 3rd story, section ''north''
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
I
2185 Inc., New York Corporation
2.6(2)
Owner•
1 Property•67 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
E
Enclave On Oxford LLC
2.5(19)
Corporate Owner•
38 Properties•2458 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 149
I
2185 Inc
2.7(4)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•98 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
R
Raul Lanzot
2.6(2)
Site Manager•
1 Property•67 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
2.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Needs improvement and complaints taken seriously.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Pretty clean and garbage is well handled.
Cons:
Obvious drug transactions within the building and the super seems to be aware and may be a participant. Extreme noise complaints go ignored by super and landlord when the office is called. Police have come to the building many times for noise.
Advice to owner:
Vet your hires better. They are involved in drug trafficking within your building and the complaints about noise and in home damage and repairs that need to be made are only increasing
2.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
Average but safe for the area
Former Tenant
Pros:
Safety, laundry, location near Pelham parkway stores.
Cons:
Loud neighbors, sub-par responsiveness from landlords, horrible elevator experiences
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here