Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.16 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
5
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 02, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling in the bathroom located at apt c4, 3rd story, 3rd apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 01, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt c4, 3rd story, 3rd apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
L
2226 LLC
1.4(2)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
4 Properties•218 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
M
Mark Perlleshi
1.4(2)
Agent•
Head Officer•
Officer•
3 Properties•143 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
J
Jagoda Realty Co.
1.4(2)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•68 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
1.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
Not a very great place to live
Former Tenant
Pros:
The apartments have a lot of space and are affordable. Accessible to train and shopping center
Cons:
The lobby entrance is always broken, people sneak into do drugs and smoke. There’s a lot of loitering in front of the building and neighbors can be selfish and play very loud music at all times of day.
Advice to owner:
Fix the building entrance, renovate the apartments as they have potential. Screen potential renters better.
1 stars
Over 2 years ago
Absolutely terrible. Avoid at all cost.
Former Tenant
Pros:
None. It was so bad that the super and even the owners said that if we didn’t like it there that we should find a new place to live (this was a response to a request to fix rotten cabinets)
Cons:
Living here is the biggest con
Advice to owner:
Sell or quit. You have no business managing a building where people are living